Skip to main content
06-1996-0142Administrative - FormalClosedFY 1996· Region 06

EPA v. BASTROP, CITY OF (MAIN PLANT)

Unilateral Administrative Order Without Adjudication

Compliance action

$24,000

Case summary

1. SECTION 309 OF THE CLEAN WATER ACT ( CWA ). 2. CITY OF BASTROP P.O. BOX 431 BASTROP, LOUISIANA 71221-0431 3. RESPONDENT WAS IN VIOLATION OF SECTION 301 OF THE CWA BY EXCEEDING THE EFFLUENT LIMITATIONS OF ITS PERMIT AND BY FAILING TO REPORT VIOLATIONS FOR THE MONITORING PERIOD OR PIPELINE. 4. RELIEF SOUGHT PURSUANT TO SECTION 309 OF THE CWA, EPA IS- SUED AN ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER REQUIRING THE RESPONDENT TO COMPLY WITH THE EFFLUENT LIMITS OF ITS PERMIT AND CORRECT THE NON-REPORTED VIOLATIONS.

Defendants (1)

  • BASTROP, CITY OFNamed in complaintNamed in settlement

Facilities (2)

  • BASTROP CITY OF

    201 E JEFFERSON, BASTROP, LA, 71220

    Registry ID: 110010591662

  • BASTROP CITY OF

    201 E JEFFERSON, BASTROP, LA, 71220

    Registry ID: 110010591662

Statutes cited

  • CWA 301NPDES Discharge without a Permit

Enforcement conclusions (1)

  • BASTROP, CITY OF (MAIN PLANT)entered 1996-06-11

    Primary law: CWA

Timeline (4 milestones)

  • 1996-06-11Enforcement Action Data Entered
  • 1996-06-11Complaint Filed/Proposed Order
  • 1996-06-11Final Order Issued
  • 1997-04-01Enforcement Action Closed

Case metadata

EPA activity ID
36444
Case number
06-1996-0142
Lead agency
EPA
HQ division
WAT
Branch
6EN-L
EPA region
06
Multimedia
No
Voluntary self-disclosure
No
Primary statute
NPDES Discharge without a Permit

Sourced verbatim from EPA ECHO Enforcement Case Report for case 06-1996-0142 . Bulk data: ICIS-FEC download summary.

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.