EPA v. ALLIED-SIGNAL, INC. - GEISMAR

Case summary

1. SECTION 309 OF THE CLEAN WATER ACT ( CWA ). 2. ALLIED-SIGNAL, INC. - GEISMAR P.O. BOX 226 GEISMAR, LOUISIANA 70734 3. RESPONDENT WAS IN VIOLATION OF SECTION 301 OF THE CWA BY EXCEEDING THE EFFLUENT LIMITATIONS OF ITS PERMIT DURING THE MONITORING PERIOD. 4. RELIEF SOUGHT PURSUANT TO SECTION 309 OF THE CWA, EPA IS- SUED AN ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER REQUIRING THE RESPONDENT TO COME INTO COMPLIANCE WITH THE EFFLUENT LIMITS OF ITS PER- MIT.

Defendants (1)

• ALLIED-SIGNAL, INC. - GEISMARNamed in complaintNamed in settlement

Facilities (4)

• PCS NITROGEN FERTILIZER LIMITED PARTNERSHIP

  5525 HIGHWAY 3115, GEISMAR, LA, 707340307

  Registry ID: 110000748059

• PCS NITROGEN FERTILIZER LIMITED PARTNERSHIP

  5525 HIGHWAY 3115, GEISMAR, LA, 707340307

  Registry ID: 110000748059

• PCS NITROGEN FERTILIZER LIMITED PARTNERSHIP

  5525 HIGHWAY 3115, GEISMAR, LA, 707340307

  Registry ID: 110000748059

• PCS NITROGEN FERTILIZER LIMITED PARTNERSHIP

  5525 HIGHWAY 3115, GEISMAR, LA, 707340307

  Registry ID: 110000748059

Statutes cited

• CWA 301 — NPDES Discharge without a Permit

Enforcement conclusions (1)

• ALLIEDSIGNAL CORPORATIONentered 1996-04-15

  Primary law: CWA

Timeline (5 milestones)

• 1996-02-28Enforcement Action Data Entered
• 1996-02-28Complaint Filed/Proposed Order
• 1996-04-15Final Order Issued
• 1996-04-15Compliance Achieved
• 1996-04-15Enforcement Action Closed