EPA v. DOUG SMITH
Final Order No Penalty
Case summary
1. SECTION 1423(C) OF THE SAFE DRINKING WATER ACT ( SDWA ), 42 U.S.C SEC. 300H-2(C). 2. DOUG SMITH TULSA, OKLAHOMA LOCATION OF WELL: SE/4, SEC. 29, T 22N, R 11E 3. RESPONDENT VIOLATED SECTION 1421 OF THE SDWA BY FAILING TO ASSURE THAT NO FLUID MOVEMENT INTO USDWS COULD OCCUR THROUGH THE TEMPORARILY ABANDONED WELL BORES. 4. RELIEF SOUGHT PURSUANT TO SECTION 1423 OF THE SDWA, AN ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER IS ISSUED ORDERING THE RESPONDENT TO PLUG THE WELL ACCORDING TO REGULATIONS WITHIN 30 DAYS, AND THE WORK SHALL BE CONSIDERED COMPLETE WHEN RESPONDENT SUB- MITS A REPORT OF WORK COMPLETED TO THE BUREAU OF INDIAN AF- FAIRS OSAGE AGENCY AND EPA AND EPA NOTIFIES THE RESPONDENT IN WRITING THAT THE WORK IS SATISFACTORY.
Defendants (1)
- DOUG SMITHNamed in complaint
Facilities (1)
DOUG SMITH
SE/4, SEC. 29, T 22N, R 11E, TULSA, OK, 74101
Registry ID: 110010652098
Statutes cited
- SDWA 1421 — UIC Regulations
Timeline (5 milestones)
- 1993-06-01Enforcement Action Data Entered
- 1993-06-01Complaint Filed/Proposed Order
- 1993-07-30Enforcement Action Closed
- 1993-07-30Final Order Issued
- 1993-07-30Compliance Achieved
Case metadata
- EPA activity ID
- 36041
- Case number
- 06-1995-0167
- Lead agency
- EPA
- HQ division
- WAT
- Branch
- 6C-AW
- EPA region
- 06
- Multimedia
- No
- Voluntary self-disclosure
- No
- Primary statute
- UIC Regulations
Sourced verbatim from EPA ECHO Enforcement Case Report for case 06-1995-0167 . Bulk data: ICIS-FEC download summary.
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.