Skip to main content
06-1988-0611Administrative - FormalClosedFY 1988· Region 06

EPA v. CERTAIN-TEED CORP.

Dismissed By Tribunal

Case summary

1. SECTION 309(G) OF THE CLEAN WATER ACT ( CWA ), 33 U.S.C. SECTION 1319(G). 2. CERTAIN-TEED CORPORATION PIPE AND PLASTIC GROUP P.O.BOX 253 SULPHUR, CALCASIEU PARISH, LOUISIANA 70663 3. RESPONDENT WAS IN VIOLATION OF SECTIONS 301 AND 308 OF THE CWA BY DISCHARGING POLLUTANTS FROM ITS FACILITY THAT EXCEEDED PERMITTED EFFLUENT LIMITATIONS, AND FAILING TO REPORT THOSE INSTANCES OF NONCOMPLIANCE. 4. RELIEF SOUGHT PURSUANT TO SECTION 309(G) OF THE CWA, EPA PROPOSED A CIVIL PENALTY OF UP TO 25,000 FOR THE VIOLA- TIONS CITED.

Defendants (1)

  • CERTAIN-TEED CORP.Named in complaint

Facilities (2)

  • CERTAINTEED CORPORATION

    3300 PETE MANENA ROAD, WESTLAKE, LA, 70669

    Registry ID: 110000449596

  • CERTAINTEED CORPORATION

    3300 PETE MANENA ROAD, WESTLAKE, LA, 70669

    Registry ID: 110000449596

Statutes cited

  • CWA 301NPDES Discharge without a Permit

Enforcement conclusions (1)

  • **PROPOSED SETTLEMENT**

    Primary law: CWA

Timeline (3 milestones)

  • 1987-10-29Enforcement Action Data Entered
  • 1987-11-02Complaint Filed/Proposed Order
  • 1999-08-25Enforcement Action Closed

Case metadata

EPA activity ID
34563
Case number
06-1988-0611
Lead agency
EPA
HQ division
WAT
Branch
WAT
EPA region
06
Multimedia
No
Voluntary self-disclosure
No
Primary statute
NPDES Discharge without a Permit

Sourced verbatim from EPA ECHO Enforcement Case Report for case 06-1988-0611 . Bulk data: ICIS-FEC download summary.

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.