EPA v. ARGENT CORP
Voluntarily Dismissed After Filing
Case summary
COST RECOVERY ACTION. DETERMINATION OF APPROPRIATE COSTS AFTER RESPONSIBLE PARTY HAS TAKEN REMEDIAL ACTIONS PURSUANT TO THE DIRECTIVES OF THE ON-SCENE COORDINATOR AND RECOVERY OF COSTS AGAINST THE PROPERTY OWNER (WHO MERELY LEASED THE FACILITY TO THE OPERATORS) ARE THE TWO PRINCIPLE ISSUES.
Defendants (2)
- ARGENT CORP.Named in complaint
- HUGH BISHOPNamed in complaint
Facilities (1)
ARGENT CORP
134 RIO RANCHO ESTATES DR SW, RIO RANCHO, NM, 87124
Registry ID: 110010743302
Statutes cited
- CERCLA 107 — Superfund
Timeline (6 milestones)
- 1982-09-29Referred To Headquarters
- 1982-10-06Referred To Dept Of Justice
- 1983-03-25Referred TO U.S. Attorney
- 1983-03-29Complaint Filed With Court
- 1985-05-10Concluded
- 1985-05-10Enforcement Action Closed
Case metadata
- EPA activity ID
- 33713
- Case number
- 06-1982-0010
- Lead agency
- EPA
- HQ division
- CER
- EPA region
- 06
- Multimedia
- No
- Voluntary self-disclosure
- No
- Primary statute
- Superfund
Sourced verbatim from EPA ECHO Enforcement Case Report for case 06-1982-0010 . Bulk data: ICIS-FEC download summary.
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.