EPA v. McLaughlin Gormley King Company (NORA)
Case summary
On October 17, 2022, EPA requested the U.S. Customs and Border Protection Redeliver and Refuse Admission of an unregistered pesticide. EPA determined that the quantity of Dimefluthrin TG and Dimefluthrin were not registered under FIFRA. Further, the broker, on behalf of the importer, confirmed the quantities of imefluthrin TG and Dimefluthrin were not labeled. As such, EPA determined that these unregistered pesticides do not qualify for an exemption from registration under FIFRA for products intended for research and development use, 40 C.F.R. 152.30(c). The importation of an unregistered pesticide is a violation of Section 12(a)(1)(A) of FIFRA.
Defendants (1)
- McLaughlin Gormley King CompanyNamed in complaintNamed in settlement
Facilities (1)
MCLAUGHLIN GORMLEY KING COMPANY (MGK)
7325 ASPEN LANE NORTH, MINNEAPOLIS, MN, 55428
Registry ID: 110070881863
Statutes cited
- FIFRA 12A1A — Unregistered Pesticide
Enforcement conclusions (1)
McLaughlin Gormley King Company (NORA)entered 2022-10-17
Primary law: FIFRA
Timeline (2 milestones)
- 2022-10-17Final Order Issued
- 2023-03-13Enforcement Action Data Entered
Case metadata
- EPA activity ID
- 3603538102
- Case number
- 05-2023-0016
- Lead agency
- EPA
- EPA region
- 05
- Voluntary self-disclosure
- No
- Primary statute
- Unregistered Pesticide
Sourced verbatim from EPA ECHO Enforcement Case Report for case 05-2023-0016 . Bulk data: ICIS-FEC download summary.
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.