EPA v. MTU Onsite Energy Corporation (Mankato MN) CAFO

Case summary

Count 1: Respondent submitted to the SERC and Mankato Fire Department a completed inventory form including sulfuric acid, lead, CITCO #1, Fleet Charge and #2 Diesel Fuel by March 1, 2015 for CY 2014; Count 2: Respondent submitted to the SERC a completed inventory form including sulfuric acid, lead, CITGO #1, Fleet Charge and #2 Diesel Fuel on November 3, 3016 for CY 2015; Count 3: Respondent submitted to Mankato Fire Dept. a completed inventory Form on November 3, 2016 for CY 2015. Count 4 (facility 2): Respondent submitted to the SERC and Mankato Fire Dept.a completed inventory Form including sulfuric acid, lead, and Fleet Charge on November 3, 2016 for CY 2014, Count 5 (facility 2) Respondent submitted to the SERC a completed Inventory Form including sulfuric acid, lead and Fleet Charge on November 3, 2016 for CY 2015; Count 6 (facility 2): Respondent submitted to Mankato Fire Dept. a completed inventory Form including sulfuric acid, lead and Fleet Charge on November 3, 2016 for CY 2015. USEPA and Respondent settled this case for a civil penalty of $32,347 for the EPCRA violations. A supplemental environmental project was also agreed to by the Respondent.

Defendants (1)

• MTU Onsite Energy CorporationNamed in complaintNamed in settlement

Facilities (2)

• MTU ONSITE ENERGY - POWER DRIVE

  100 POWER DR, CITY OF MANKATO, MN, 56001

  Registry ID: 110012187711

• MTU ONSITE ENERGY - POWER DRIVE

  100 POWER DR, CITY OF MANKATO, MN, 56001

  Registry ID: 110012187711

Statutes cited

• EPCRA 312 — Emergency and Hazardous Chemical Inventory Forms

Enforcement conclusions (1)

• MTU Onsite Energy Corporation (Mankato MN) CAFOentered 2017-11-30

  Primary law: EPCRA

  Federal penalty: $32,347 · SEP: $58,853

Timeline (3 milestones)

• 2017-11-30Complaint Filed/Proposed Order
• 2017-11-30Final Order Issued
• 2017-12-06Enforcement Action Data Entered