EPA v. CEDAR CREEK (OU 2A) - ADMIN STLMNT AGRMT (CERCLA)

Case summary

This Settlement Agreement requires the Respondent (Mercury Marine) to conduct an Engineering Evaluation and Cost Analysis (EE/CA) Report of alternative response actions to address the environmental concerns associated with that portion of the Cedar Creek Superfund Alternative Site identified as Cedar Creek OU2A - Cedar Creek Ponds. With the completion of work at the Plant 2 OU, the purpose for this Settlement Agreement is to further divide the Creek OU into two subparts to expedite work at the Site with the intent of commencing the work determined to be necessary after review of the EE/CA required to be completed under this Settlement Agreement for 0U2A - Ponds in 2015

Defendants (1)

• Mercury Marine, a Division of BrunswickNamed in settlement

Facilities (1)

• CEDAR CREEK

  INTER. OF COLUMBIA RD & CEDAR CREEK, CEDARBURG, WI, 53012

  Registry ID: 110009317890

Statutes cited

• CERCLA 106A — Imminent & Substantial Endangerment Order

Enforcement conclusions (1)

• CEDAR CREEK (OU 2A) - ADMIN STLMNT AGRMT (CERCLA)entered 2014-08-21

  Primary law: CERCLA

Timeline (2 milestones)

• 2014-08-21Final Order Issued
• 2014-09-16Enforcement Action Data Entered