EPA v. SPECTRO ALLOYS CORPORATION
Case summary
Region 5 plans to file a Consent Agreement and Final Order (CAFO) concurrently with an Administrative Consent Order (ACO) to resolve an FOV issued March 26, 2013, to Spectro Alloys Corporation (Spectro), of Rosemount, Minnesota. EPAs FOV alleged Spectro emitted PM in excess of limits contained in its Title V Permit and the National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) at 40 C.F.R. § 63.1505(b)(1), and failed to ensure its baghouse bags were in good working condition in accordance with the NESHAP at 40 C.F.R. §§ 63.6(e)(1)(i) during its January 8-9, 2013 performance test at the Hammermill baghouse. The ACO requires that Spectro submit an updated OM&M Plan incorporating additional baghouse inspections, calibrations, quality assurance measures, and a specific range of differential pressure standards within 60 days of the effective date of the ACO. The compliance provisions in the ACO also require that Spectro inspect baghouse leak detection systems and continue to record pressure drop across the Hammermill baghouse once per shift. The CAFO will require Spectro to pay a penalty of $52,588. Spectro is currently in compliance with the Clean Air Act.
Defendants (1)
- SPECTRO ALLOYS CORPORATIONNamed in complaintNamed in settlement
Facilities (1)
EGA SPECTRO ALLOYS
13220 REVIVAL WAY, ROSEMOUNT, MN, 55068
Registry ID: 110000423907
Statutes cited
- CAA 112 — Hazardous Air Pollutants
Enforcement conclusions (1)
SPECTRO ALLOYS CORPORATIONentered 2013-09-26
Primary law: CAA
Federal penalty: $52,588
Timeline (3 milestones)
- 2013-09-26Final Order Issued
- 2013-09-26Complaint Filed/Proposed Order
- 2013-10-17Enforcement Action Data Entered
Case metadata
- EPA activity ID
- 3400163240
- Case number
- 05-2013-5056
- Lead agency
- EPA
- EPA region
- 05
- Voluntary self-disclosure
- No
- Primary statute
- Hazardous Air Pollutants
Sourced verbatim from EPA ECHO Enforcement Case Report for case 05-2013-5056 . Bulk data: ICIS-FEC download summary.
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.