EPA v. BURLINGTON NORTHERN (BRAINERD/BAXTER PLANT) - ADMIN ORDER ON CONSENT (CERCLA)
Case summary
The Settlement Agreement concerns the preparation and performance of a remedial investigation and feasibility study (RI/FS) at the Burlington Northern Railroad Tie Treatment Facility Superfund Site and for the reimbursement for future response costs incurred by U.S. EPA in connection with the RI/FS, as well as past response costs. The site is located partially in the City of Baxter and partially in the City of Brainerd. Northern Pacific Railroad and Burlington Northern Railroad, predecessors to BNSF, operated a railroad tie treatment plant at the Site from approximately 1907 to 1986. The historical land use at the Site has included railroad tie treating, loading and unloading of ties and timbers, timber storage, and several railroad lines. The contamination from this site includes PAH compounds, heterocycles, salts, oil and grease, benzene extractable hydrocarbons, and total phenols.
Defendants (1)
- BNSF RAILWAY COMPANYNamed in settlement
Facilities (1)
BURLINGTON NORTHERN (BRAINERD/BAXTER PLANT)
WEST CITY LIMITS, BRAINERD, MN, 56401
Registry ID: 110009292871
Statutes cited
- CERCLA 107A — Cost Recovery
- CERCLA 122A — Agreement to Perform Work Under 104B
Enforcement conclusions (1)
BURLINGTON NORTHERN (BRAINERD/BAXTER PLANT) - ADMIN ORDER ON CONSENT (CERCLA)entered 2012-12-18
Primary law: CERCLA
Timeline (2 milestones)
- 2012-11-08Enforcement Action Data Entered
- 2012-12-18Final Order Issued
Case metadata
- EPA activity ID
- 3000080183
- Case number
- 05-2013-1002
- Lead agency
- EPA
- EPA region
- 05
- Voluntary self-disclosure
- No
- Primary statute
- Cost Recovery
Sourced verbatim from EPA ECHO Enforcement Case Report for case 05-2013-1002 . Bulk data: ICIS-FEC download summary.
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.