EPA v. SHELLY DITCH CONSENT DECREE FOR COST RECOVERY (CERCLA)
Case summary
THE UNITED STATES, ON BEHALF OF THE US EPA, FILED A COMPLAINT IN THIS MATTER PURSUANT TO SECTION 107 OF CERCLA, SEEKING REIMBURSEMENT OF THE RESPONSE COSTS INCURRED OR TO BE INCURRED FOR RESPONSE ACTIONS TAKEN AT OR IN CONNECTION WITH THE RELEASE OR THREATENED RELEASE OF HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES AT THE SHELLY DITCH REACH 4 SUPERFUND SITE, SHELLY DITCH (REACH 1-3), SUGAR CREEK SITE, AND THE CALUMET CONTAINERS SITE.
Defendants (1)
- RAYBESTOS PRODUCTS COMPANYNamed in complaintNamed in settlement
Facilities (1)
SHELLY DITCH
SOUTH OF VALLEY ST., CRAWFORDSVILLE, IN, 47933
Registry ID: 110009350166
Statutes cited
- CERCLA 107A — Cost Recovery
Enforcement conclusions (1)
SHELLY DITCH CONSENT DECREE FOR COST RECOVERY (CERCLA)entered 2007-05-24
Primary law: CERCLA
Timeline (5 milestones)
- 2007-02-22Referred To Dept Of Justice
- 2007-03-21Complaint Filed With Court
- 2007-03-21Final Order Lodged
- 2007-04-09Enforcement Action Data Entered
- 2007-05-24Final Order Entered
Case metadata
- EPA activity ID
- 600036677
- Case number
- 05-2007-0815
- DOJ docket
- 90-11-3-08736
- Lead agency
- EPA
- EPA region
- 05
- Voluntary self-disclosure
- No
- Primary statute
- Cost Recovery
Sourced verbatim from EPA ECHO Enforcement Case Report for case 05-2007-0815 . Bulk data: ICIS-FEC download summary.
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.