EPA v. Daimler Chrysler (Toledo) NOD
Case summary
Daimler Chrysler conducted audits at this facility and found that, although their Tier IIs were submitted in a timely manner, they failed to include the lead from the batteries on their forklifts. This will be resolved with a NOD - no penalty.
Defendants (1)
- Daimler Chrysler (Toledo)Named in complaintNamed in settlement
Facilities (1)
DAIMLER CHRYSLER TOLEDO NORTH ASSEMBLY PLANT
4400 CHRYSLER DRIVE, TOLEDO, OH, 43608
Registry ID: 110024282186
Statutes cited
- EPCRA 304 — Emergency Release Notification Section 313 Program
- EPCRA 312 — Emergency and Hazardous Chemical Inventory Forms
Enforcement conclusions (1)
Daimler Chrysler (Toledo) NODentered 2006-06-30
Primary law: EPCRA
Timeline (4 milestones)
- 2006-06-30Final Order Issued
- 2006-06-30Notice of Violation Sent
- 2006-06-30Pipeline Closed
- 2006-08-08Enforcement Action Data Entered
Case metadata
- EPA activity ID
- 200005143
- Case number
- 05-2006-3694
- Lead agency
- EPA
- EPA region
- 05
- Voluntary self-disclosure
- Yes
- Primary statute
- Emergency Release Notification Section 313 Program
Sourced verbatim from EPA ECHO Enforcement Case Report for case 05-2006-3694 . Bulk data: ICIS-FEC download summary.
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.