Skip to main content
05-2005-3619Administrative - FormalClosedFY 2005· Region 05

EPA v. GAC MidAmerica - ESA

Final Order With Penalty

Case summary

On August 11, 2004, an inspection was conducted to determine whether the facility was complying with RMP regulations. The facility submitted an initial RMP on April 12, 2000. Some more serious violations include: Not addressing engineering and administrative controls applicable to hazards and interrelationships in their PHA; Not addressing consequences of failure of engineering and administrative controls in their PHA; Not evaluating a range of possible safety and health effects arising from failure in controls in their PHA; Not having emergency shutdown procedures; Not documenting and retaining the last two compliance audits and their findings.

Defendants (1)

  • GAC MidAmericaNamed in complaintNamed in settlement

Facilities (1)

  • GAC MIDAMERICA

    1598 SENATE AVE., INDIANAPOLIS, IN, 46225

    Registry ID: 110002054384

Statutes cited

  • CAA 112[R][7]Prevention of Accidental Release/Risk Management Plans (RMPs)

Enforcement conclusions (1)

  • GAC MidAmerica - ESAentered 2005-06-28

    Primary law: CAA

    Federal penalty: $900

Timeline (6 milestones)

  • 2005-03-22Expedited Settlement Offered
  • 2005-06-28Enforcement Action Closed
  • 2005-06-28Complaint Filed/Proposed Order
  • 2005-06-28Final Order Issued
  • 2005-06-28Compliance Achieved
  • 2005-06-29Enforcement Action Data Entered

Case metadata

EPA activity ID
150606
Case number
05-2005-3619
Lead agency
EPA
EPA region
05
Voluntary self-disclosure
No
Primary statute
Prevention of Accidental Release/Risk Management Plans (RMPs)

Sourced verbatim from EPA ECHO Enforcement Case Report for case 05-2005-3619 . Bulk data: ICIS-FEC download summary.

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.