Skip to main content
05-2001-0425Administrative - FormalClosedFY 2001· Region 05

EPA v. COMPLETE AUTO SERVICE

Final Order No Penalty

Case summary

OWNER WAS PERFORMING MOTOR VEHICILE AIR CONDITIONER (MVAC) WORK INVOLVING REFRIGERANT WITHOUT USING REFRIGERANT RECOV- ERY EQUIPMENT DEDICATED FOR THAT SPECIFIC REFRIGERANT AS REQUIRED BY 40 C.F.R. SECTION 82.34(A)(1). THE AO ORDERS THE OWNER TO ENSURE THAT ONLY DEDICATED REFRIGERANT RECOVERY EQUIPMENT WILL BE USED TO PERFORM SERVICE OR REPAIR ON MVACS THE OWNER SHALL CERTIFY THAT IT WILL NOT PERFORM SERVICE OR REPAIR ON MVACS WITHOUT PROPERLY USING REFRIGERANT RECOVERY EQUIPMENT APPROVED PURSUANT TO SECTION 82.36.

Defendants (1)

  • COMPLETE AUTO SERVICENamed in settlement

Facilities (1)

  • SUNOCO SERVICE STATION

    26680 W 7 MILE RD, DETROIT, MI, 48240

    Registry ID: 110008441212

Statutes cited

  • CAA 113AViolation of Existing Administrative Order

Enforcement conclusions (1)

  • COMPLETE AUTO SERVICEentered 2001-08-31

    Primary law: CAA

Timeline (3 milestones)

  • 2001-04-20Enforcement Action Data Entered
  • 2001-08-31Final Order Issued
  • 2001-08-31Enforcement Action Closed

Case metadata

EPA activity ID
33061
Case number
05-2001-0425
Lead agency
EPA
HQ division
AIR
Branch
MMBII
EPA region
05
Multimedia
No
Voluntary self-disclosure
No
Primary statute
Violation of Existing Administrative Order

Sourced verbatim from EPA ECHO Enforcement Case Report for case 05-2001-0425 . Bulk data: ICIS-FEC download summary.

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.