EPA v. BP EXPLORATION & OIL COMPANY

Case summary

THIS CASE IS PART OF THE NATIONAL PETROLEUM REFINING IN- ITIATIVE IN WHICH BP IS RESOLVING FOUR CAA MARQUEE ISSUES AT TWO OF BP'S REFINERIES, IN WHITING, IN AND TOLEDO, OHIO. ACCORDINGLY, HQ'S AIR DIVISION IS THE CONTACT FOR THIS MULLTI-MEDIA MATTER. IN 1994, REGION 5 REFERRED CAA AND RCRA VIOLATIONS AT BP'S WHITING FACILITY. THIS FORM DOCUMENTS (1) THE REFERRAL OF CAA VIOLATIONS AT BP'S TOLEDO REFINERY, AND (2) AMENDS THE 1994 WHITING REFERRAL TO ADD NEW CAA PREVENTION OF SIGNIFICANT DETERIORATION VIOLATIONS. BP CD ENTERED 8/29/01. CD IS AVAILABLE AT WWW.USDOJ.GOV/ ENRD/BPCD.HTM.

Defendants (3)

• ARCO PRODUCTS CO.Named in settlement
• BP EXPLORATION & OIL COMPANYNamed in settlement
• AMOCO OIL COMPANYNamed in settlement

Facilities (1)

• BP HUSKY TOLEDO REFINERY

  4001 CEDAR POINT RD., OREGON, OH, 43616

  Registry ID: 110000384361

Statutes cited

• CAA 113A — Violation of Existing Administrative Order

Enforcement conclusions (1)

• BP EXPLORATION & OIL COentered 2001-08-29

  Primary law: CAA

Timeline (5 milestones)

• 2000-09-28Referred To Dept Of Justice
• 2000-10-18Enforcement Action Data Entered
• 2001-01-18Final Order Lodged
• 2001-01-18Complaint Filed With Court
• 2001-08-29Final Order Entered