EPA v. ORBIT ENTERPRISES SITE
Case summary
THIS ORDER REQUIRES THE RESPONDENTS, DONALD E. AND CHARLOTTE WALTER, TO CONDUCT REMOVAL ACTIVITING TO ABATE AN IMMINENT AND SUBSTANTIAL ENDANGERMENT TO THE PUBLIC HEALTH, WELFARE OR THE ENVIRONMENT THAT MAY BE PRESENTED BY THE ACTUAL OR THREATENED RELEASE OF HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES AT OR FROM THE SITE. RESPONDENTS SHALL REIMBURSE U.S. EPA FOR ALL RESPONSE COSTS INCURRED BY THE UNITED STATES IN OVERSEEING RESPONDENT 'S IMPLEMENTATION OF THE REQUIREMENTS OF THIS ORDER. VIOLA- TION OF ANY PROVISION OF THIS ORDER MAY SUBJECT RESPONDENTS TO CIVIL PENALTIES OF UP TO $27,500 PER VIOLATION PER DAY.
Defendants (1)
- ORBIT ENTERPRISES SITENamed in settlement
Facilities (1)
ORBIT ENTERPRISES
344 EAST BURNHAM, BATTLE CREEK, MI, 49017
Registry ID: 110009292906
Statutes cited
- CERCLA 107A — Cost Recovery
Enforcement conclusions (1)
ORBIT ENTERPRISES SITEentered 2000-08-18
Primary law: CERCLA
Timeline (2 milestones)
- 2000-08-18Final Order Issued
- 2000-09-20Enforcement Action Data Entered
Case metadata
- EPA activity ID
- 32470
- Case number
- 05-2000-0465
- Lead agency
- EPA
- HQ division
- CER
- Branch
- MMBI
- EPA region
- 05
- Multimedia
- No
- Voluntary self-disclosure
- No
- Primary statute
- Cost Recovery
Sourced verbatim from EPA ECHO Enforcement Case Report for case 05-2000-0465 . Bulk data: ICIS-FEC download summary.
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.