EPA v. CINERGY - BECKJORD

Case summary

CASE IS PART OF THE COAL-FIRED UTILITIES ENFORCEMENT INITIA- TIVE BASED ON VIOLATIONS OF PSD AND NONATTAINMENT NSR RE- QUIREMENTS. AMENDED COMPLAINT WAS FILED 02/00. SETTLEMENT DISCUSSIONS CONTINUE - CASE STAYED. The United States, joined by citizens' groups and several Northeastern states, had claimed that Cinergy, an electric utility company, violated the New Source Review provisions of the Clean Air Act when it performed construction projects at several coal-fired power plants in Indiana and Ohio without first obtaining a permit and installing required pollution control hardware. The Court bifurcated the case into separate liability and remedy phases. On May 22, 2008, after a three-week jury trial on liability, the jury returned a verdict in favor of the Plaintiffs for four boiler component replacement projects at the Wabash River Plant's units 2, 3 and 5. The jury found in favor of Cinergy with respect to ten similar projects at the Gallagher, Gibson, Miami Fort, and Beckjord Plants.

Defendants (1)

• CINERGY - BECKJORD

Facilities (4)

• CINERGY - BECKJORD STATION

  757 U.S. ROUTE 52, NEW RICHMOND, OH, 45157

  Registry ID: 110056953890

• CINERGY - BECKJORD STATION

  757 U.S. ROUTE 52, NEW RICHMOND, OH, 45157

  Registry ID: 110056953890

• CINERGY - BECKJORD STATION

  757 U.S. ROUTE 52, NEW RICHMOND, OH, 45157

  Registry ID: 110056953890

• CINERGY - BECKJORD STATION

  757 U.S. ROUTE 52, NEW RICHMOND, OH, 45157

  Registry ID: 110056953890

Statutes cited

• CAA 165 — Prevention of Significant Deterioration (PSD)
• CAA 110 — Implementation Plan for National Primary and Secondary Ambient Air Quality Standards

Timeline (4 milestones)

• 1999-10-27Referred To Dept Of Justice
• 1999-11-03Complaint Filed With Court
• 2000-03-15Enforcement Action Data Entered
• 2008-05-22Enforcement Action Closed