EPA v. CLARK REFINING & MARKETING, INC. (HARTFORD, IL)
Case summary
THIS IS A CIVIL ACTION UNDER THE CLEAN AIR ACT AGAINST CLARK'S REFINERY IN HARTFORD, IL. THE U.S. ALLEGES 3 COUNTS IN ITS COMPLAINT: (1) THAT CLARK EXCEEDED ITS AIR EMISSION LIMITS FOR PARTICULATE MATTER, (2) THAT CLARK OPERATED ITS FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING UNIT WITHOUT A PERMIT, AND (3) THAT THE FCCU IS SUBJECT TO THE PSD RULES FOR THE REASON THAT CLARK MADE A MAJOR MODIFICATION TO THE FCCU WITHOUT FIRST APPLYING FOR A PSD PERMIT. THE MAJOR MODIFICATION OF THE FCCU CAUSED A SIGNIFICANT INCREASES IN EMISSIONS OF PARTICULATE MATTER, SO2 AND NOX. THE CASE WAS FILED ON 02/04/99.
Defendants (1)
- CLARK REFINING & MARKETING, INC.Named in complaintNamed in settlement
Facilities (2)
PREMCOR REFINING GROUP INCORPORATED
201 EAST HAWTHORNE STREET, HARTFORD, IL, 62048
Registry ID: 110040961705
PREMCOR REFINING GROUP INCORPORATED
201 EAST HAWTHORNE STREET, HARTFORD, IL, 62048
Registry ID: 110040961705
Statutes cited
- CAA 113B — Clean Air Act
- CAA 113A — Violation of Existing Administrative Order
Enforcement conclusions (1)
CLARK REFINING & MARKETINGentered 2001-09-23
Primary law: CAA
Timeline (5 milestones)
- 1997-09-27Referred To Dept Of Justice
- 1999-02-04Complaint Filed With Court
- 1999-09-09Enforcement Action Data Entered
- 2001-07-12Final Order Lodged
- 2001-09-23Final Order Entered
Case metadata
- EPA activity ID
- 31845
- Case number
- 05-1999-0539
- Lead agency
- EPA
- HQ division
- AIR
- Branch
- MMBI
- EPA region
- 05
- Multimedia
- No
- Voluntary self-disclosure
- No
- Primary statute
- Clean Air Act
Sourced verbatim from EPA ECHO Enforcement Case Report for case 05-1999-0539 . Bulk data: ICIS-FEC download summary.
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.