EPA v. PERRY CREEK CRANBERRY CORPORATION, AND TIMOTHY FINCH
Final Order No Penalty
Case summary
RESTORATION INVOLVED PUSHING DIRT WITH A BULLDOZER TO GET IT OFF THE WETLANDS WHICH HAD BEEN IMPACTED BY EARLIER BULL- DOZING, AND BACK INTO THE RESERVOIR FROM WHICH IT WAS DREDGE D. REMAINING RESTORATION IS LIMITED TO MONITORING TO INSURE THAT INVASIVE SPECIES DO NOT DEGRADE THE WETLAND HABITAT (E.G., PURPLE LOOSESTRIFE).
Defendants (1)
- PERRY CREEK CRANBERRY CORP. & TIMOTHY FINamed in complaintNamed in settlement
Facilities (1)
PERRY CREEK CRANBERRY CORP & TIMOTHY FINCH
RURAL RT #3, BOX 93, CRANBERRY DR, BLACK RIVER FALLS, WI, 54615
Registry ID: 110010628945
Statutes cited
- CWA 404 — Permits for Dredge and Fill Material
- CWA 301 — NPDES Discharge without a Permit
Enforcement conclusions (1)
PERRY CREEK CRANBERRY CORPORATION AND TIMOTHY FINCentered 1998-03-04
Primary law: CWA
Timeline (3 milestones)
- 1998-03-04Final Order Issued
- 1998-03-04Enforcement Action Closed
- 1998-04-16Enforcement Action Data Entered
Case metadata
- EPA activity ID
- 30877
- Case number
- 05-1998-0258
- Lead agency
- EPA
- HQ division
- WAT
- Branch
- MMBII
- EPA region
- 05
- Multimedia
- No
- Voluntary self-disclosure
- No
- Primary statute
- Permits for Dredge and Fill Material
Sourced verbatim from EPA ECHO Enforcement Case Report for case 05-1998-0258 . Bulk data: ICIS-FEC download summary.
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.