EPA v. PAINESVILLE, OH; STURGIS, MI

Case summary

WE WOULD LIKE AN ATTORNEY ASSIGNED AS A POINT PERSON TO DEAL WITH HQ ON DEVELOPING THESE APOS. HQ HAS A BOILERPLATE APO, PENALTY CALCULATION, AND A COPY OF THE SLUDGE FILE. WE ANTICIPATE SHIPPING UP TO 20 OF THESE APO CANDIDATE WITHIN THE NEXT TWO WEEKS FOR HQ TECHNICAL PREPARATION. IT WOULD BE EXPEDIENT IF WE COULD MINIMIZE THE NUMBER OF LEGAL CONTACTS OKSTER AND ONE OTHER TECHNICAL ASSIGNEE HAD IN ORC. VAL AISTARS IS THE PROGRAM CONTACT. PLEASE LET ME KNOW WHO THE LEGAL ASSIGNEE(S) IS/ARE. VIOLATION OF CEILING LIMITATION FOR MOLYBDENUM IN MUNICIPAL SLUDGE REGULATIONS UNDER CLEAN WATER ACT SECTION 405 (D).

Defendants (1)

• PAINESVILLE, OH; STURGIS, MINamed in settlement

Facilities (1)

• CITY OF PAINESVILLE

  1170 NORTH STATE STREET, PAINESVILLE, OH, 44077

  Registry ID: 110009489339

Statutes cited

• CWA 309 — Violation of Existing AO

Enforcement conclusions (1)

• PAINESVILLE, OH; STURGISentered 1998-01-07

  Primary law: CWA

  Federal penalty: $1,500

Timeline (4 milestones)

• 1997-08-28Enforcement Action Data Entered
• 1997-09-30Complaint Filed/Proposed Order
• 1998-01-07Final Order Issued
• 1998-01-26Enforcement Action Closed