EPA v. TUCK, GORDON AND HARRY STEPHENS
Penalty assessed
$150,000
Case summary
DEFENDANTS WERE ISSUED ON AO BECAUSE THEY FAILED TO 1) DEMONSTRATE MI W/IN 5 YEARS OF LOST MI DEMONSTRATION (MAY 28, 1995). 2) FAILED TO SUBMIT MONTHLY MONITORING REPORTS. 3) FAILED TO SUBMIT QUARTERLY MONITORING REPORTS. 4) FAILED TO PAY AN ASSESSED PENALTY OF $75,800. THIS ACTION IS TO ENFORCE THE ORDER TO COLLECT THE PENALTY DEBT OWING THE UNITED STATES.(ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER = DOCKET NUMBER 05-91-0252.)THE UNITED STATES IS CURRENTLY ATTEMPTING TO RECOVER THE PENALTY DUE AND OWING BY BOTH DEFENDANTS. THE COLLECTION ACTION IS BEING HANDLED BY THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY'S OFFICE IN DETROIT.
Defendants (2)
- GORDON TUCKNamed in complaintNamed in settlement
- HARRY STEPHENSNamed in complaintNamed in settlement
Facilities (1)
STATE A-5 WELL
SEC 33 RNG3W TWP 2IN N .5 SW .25 SE .25, HEADQUARTERS FIELD, MI, 48624
Registry ID: 110010754317
Statutes cited
- SDWA 1421 — UIC Regulations
Enforcement conclusions (1)
GORDON TUCK AND HARRY STEPHENS (COLLECTION ACTION)entered 1997-08-06
Primary law: SDWA
Federal penalty: $150,000
Timeline (5 milestones)
- 1995-05-01Enforcement Action Data Entered
- 1995-05-23Referred To Dept Of Justice
- 1996-03-28Complaint Filed With Court
- 1997-08-06Final Order Lodged
- 1997-08-06Final Order Entered
Case metadata
- EPA activity ID
- 29736
- Case number
- 05-1996-0281
- Lead agency
- EPA
- HQ division
- WAT
- Branch
- MMBI
- EPA region
- 05
- Multimedia
- No
- Voluntary self-disclosure
- No
- Primary statute
- UIC Regulations
Sourced verbatim from EPA ECHO Enforcement Case Report for case 05-1996-0281 . Bulk data: ICIS-FEC download summary.
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.