EPA v. CARDINAL CHEMICAL CORPORATION
Final Order With Penalty
Penalty assessed
$300
Case summary
THE COMPLAINT ALLEGES THAT RESPONDENT IS A DISTRIBUTOR OF A PESTICIDE CALLED HERBICIDE 334 COMPLETE VEGETATION KILLER. A STATE AGRICULTURE DEPARTMENT INSPECTOR ON MARCH 21, 1994 COLLECTED A SAMPLE FROM THE RESPONDENT'S BUSINESS. THE COMPLAINT ALLEGES RESPONDENT IS A DISTRIBUTOR OF THE REGISTERED PESTICIDE. THE REGISTRANT FOR THE PESTICIDE IS FRANK MILLER & SONS, INCORPORATED WHO HAS A SIMILAR COMPLAINT BEING FILED AGAINST THEM. THE COMPLAINT ALLEGES THAT THE PESTICIDE LABEL IS MISBRANDED IN THAT IT LISTS PENTACHLOROPHENOL AS AN ACTIVE INGREDIENT, WHICH THE PESTICIDE DOES NOT CONTAIN, AND THAT IT DID NOT CONTAIN A WARNING STATEMENT AS SUBMITTED FOR PESTICIDE REGISTRATION. ( DO NOT INDUCE VOMITING; THE LABEL STATED IF SWALLOWED, INDUCE VOMITING IMMEDIATELY. )
Defendants (1)
- CARDINAL CHEMICAL CORPORATIONNamed in complaintNamed in settlement
Facilities (1)
CARDINAL CHEM CORP
719 BUSH ST, TOLEDO, OH, 43604
Registry ID: 110010739674
Statutes cited
- FIFRA 14 — Fed. Insect, Fung & Rod Act
Enforcement conclusions (1)
CARDINAL CHEMICAL CORPORATIONentered 1997-02-06
Primary law: FIFRA
Federal penalty: $300
Timeline (4 milestones)
- 1996-02-27Enforcement Action Data Entered
- 1996-07-11Complaint Filed/Proposed Order
- 1997-02-06Final Order Issued
- 1997-03-27Enforcement Action Closed
Case metadata
- EPA activity ID
- 29600
- Case number
- 05-1996-0107
- Lead agency
- EPA
- HQ division
- TOX
- Branch
- MMB
- EPA region
- 05
- Multimedia
- No
- Voluntary self-disclosure
- No
- Primary statute
- Fed. Insect, Fung & Rod Act
Sourced verbatim from EPA ECHO Enforcement Case Report for case 05-1996-0107 . Bulk data: ICIS-FEC download summary.
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.