EPA v. BOHATY DRUM SITE
Cost recovery
$100,000
Case summary
EPA CONDUCTED AN EMERGENCY REMOVAL ACTION AT THE BOHATY DRUM SITE IN 1992 AND INCURRED APPROXIMATELY $670,000 FOR REMOVAL AND DISPOSAL OF 1000 DRUMS. THIS ACTION SEEKS RECOVERY OF THE REMOVAL COSTS FROM JOHN AND ETHEL BOHATTY (CURRENT SITE OWNERS) AND PPG AND GLIDDEN (GENERATORS OF HAZARDOUS WASTE.)
Defendants (7)
- PPG INDUSTRIES, INC.
- BARBARA BOHATY
- BELINDA BOHATY
- IN REM PARCEL OF LANDNamed in complaintNamed in settlement
- JOHN AND ETHEL BOHATY
- SUSAN BOHATY
- THE GLIDDEN COMPANYNamed in complaintNamed in settlement
Facilities (1)
BOHATY DRUMS
4271 PEARL RD, MEDINA, OH, 44256
Registry ID: 110010593367
Statutes cited
- CERCLA 107A — Cost Recovery
Enforcement conclusions (1)
BOHATY DRUM SITEentered 2001-01-04
Primary law: CERCLA
Timeline (5 milestones)
- 1991-11-15Enforcement Action Data Entered
- 1994-03-13Referred To Dept Of Justice
- 1995-05-05Complaint Filed With Court
- 2000-10-25Final Order Lodged
- 2001-01-04Final Order Entered
Case metadata
- EPA activity ID
- 29144
- Case number
- 05-1995-0125
- Lead agency
- EPA
- HQ division
- CER
- Branch
- SWERB
- EPA region
- 05
- Multimedia
- No
- Voluntary self-disclosure
- No
- Primary statute
- Cost Recovery
Sourced verbatim from EPA ECHO Enforcement Case Report for case 05-1995-0125 . Bulk data: ICIS-FEC download summary.
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.