EPA v. SPARTA LANDFILL
Case summary
THIS CASE INVOLVES AND ADMINISTRATIVE CONSENT ORDER WITH 2 POTENTIALLY RESPONSIBLE PARTIES WHO HAVE AGREED TO: (1) REIMBURSE EPA FOR 100% OF ITS PAST AND OVERSIGHT COSTS; (2) PERFORM AN RI/FS; (3) IMPLEMENT A PRESUMPTIVE REMEDY SOLID WASTE CAP.
Defendants (2)
- COUNTY OF KENT, DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WRKNamed in complaintNamed in settlement
- SPARTA TOWNSHIPNamed in complaint
Facilities (1)
SPARTA LANDFILL
10322 ALPINE AVENUE, SPARTA, MI, 49345
Registry ID: 110009291738
Statutes cited
- CERCLA 122D3 — Violation of Existing AO or CD
- CERCLA 122A — Agreement to Perform Work Under 104B
- CERCLA 107A — Cost Recovery
- CERCLA 106A — Imminent & Substantial Endangerment Order
- CERCLA 104E1 — Recordkeeping, Inspection, Information Request
Enforcement conclusions (1)
SPARTA LANDFILL AOC (MONITORING AND COST RECOVERY)entered 2002-09-26
Primary law: CERCLA
Timeline (3 milestones)
- 1993-09-23Complaint Filed/Proposed Order
- 1994-09-23Enforcement Action Data Entered
- 2002-09-26Final Order Issued
Case metadata
- EPA activity ID
- 28897
- Case number
- 05-1994-0275
- Lead agency
- EPA
- HQ division
- CER
- Branch
- SWERB
- EPA region
- 05
- Multimedia
- No
- Voluntary self-disclosure
- No
- Primary statute
- Violation of Existing AO or CD
Sourced verbatim from EPA ECHO Enforcement Case Report for case 05-1994-0275 . Bulk data: ICIS-FEC download summary.
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.