EPA v. E.H. SCHILLING/ASOMA & MATLACK DEMINIMIS

Case summary

A CONSENT DECREE WAS PREVIOUSLY ENTERED WITH MAJOR PRPS AGREEING TO DO RD/RA AND PAY ALL PAST AND FUTURE RESPONSE COSTS EXCEPT FOR THE FIRST $236,000 OF OVERSIGHT COSTS. THESE WERE RESERVED FOR 2 NON-SETTLING PRPS, ASOMA AND MATLACK, INC. LATER A DETERMINATION WAS MADE THAT THERE CONTRIBUTION WAS RELATIVELY SMALL AND THAT A SETTLEMENT FOR THE OUTSTANDING CLAIM WOULD BE APPROPRIATE IN THE FORM OF A DEMINIMIS SETTLEMENT. RELATED SITE MATTER NUMBERS IN DOCKET INCLUDE 05-87-0242 AND 05-93-0880. THE LATTER NUMBER IS FOR RD/RA CONSENT DECREE. THE FIRST RELATES TO THIS DEMINIMIS SETTLEMENT IN THE EARLY STAGES.

Defendants (2)

• ASSOCIATED METALS & MINERALS CORPORATIONNamed in complaintNamed in settlement
• MATLACK, INC.Named in complaintNamed in settlement

Facilities (1)

• SCHILLING EH LANDFILL

  RTE 52 AND PATRIC RD, IRONTON, OH, 45638

  Registry ID: 110007707758

Statutes cited

• CERCLA 122G — Administrative De Minimis Settlement
• CERCLA 107 — Superfund

Enforcement conclusions (1)

• E.H. SCHILLING/ASOMA & MATLACK DEMINIMISentered 1994-03-18

  Primary law: CERCLA

Timeline (5 milestones)

• 1993-12-01Complaint Filed/Proposed Order
• 1994-03-18Final Order Issued
• 1994-07-19Enforcement Action Data Entered
• 1996-05-02Compliance Achieved
• 1997-04-10Enforcement Action Closed