EPA v. NEASE CHEMICAL COMPANY
Unilateral Administrative Order Without Adjudication
Case summary
NEASE CHEMICAL HAS AN EXISTING LEACHATE COLLECTION TREATMENT SYSTEM (LCTS) THAT HAD NOT BEEN FUNCTIONING PROPERLY FOR A NUMBER OF YEARS. THE AGENCY HAD PREVIOUSLY ATTEMPTED TO GET NEASE TO VOLUNTARILY FIX AND IMPROVE ITS LCTS. NEASE DID NOT DO THIS. IN EARLY 1993, IT WAS DETERMINED THAT NEASE'S LEACHATE / SURFACE WATER CONTAMINATION PROBLEM NECESSITATED AN EMERGENCY REMOVAL ACTION. THE AGENCY SENT OUT NOTICE LETTERS IN EARLY 1994 AND NEGOTIATIONS FOR A SETTLEMENT COMMENCED SHORTLY THEREAFTER. AN ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER BY CONSENT FOR AN EMERGENCY REMOVAL ACTION AT NEASE CHEMICAL WAS SUCCESSFULLY NEGOTITATED WITH NEASE. THE AOC WAS SIGNED BY US EPA FOR NOVEMBER 11, 1993, WHICH IS THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THE ORDER.
Facilities (1)
RUETGERS-NEASE CORPORATION
BENTON ROAD, ROUTE 14A, SALEM, OH, 444600000
Registry ID: 110008470029
Statutes cited
- CERCLA 106 — Imminent & Substantial Endangerment Order
Timeline (4 milestones)
- 1993-10-17Complaint Filed/Proposed Order
- 1993-11-11Final Order Issued
- 1993-11-11Enforcement Action Closed
- 1994-07-12Enforcement Action Data Entered
Case metadata
- EPA activity ID
- 28826
- Case number
- 05-1994-0171
- Lead agency
- EPA
- HQ division
- CER
- Branch
- SWERB
- EPA region
- 05
- Multimedia
- No
- Voluntary self-disclosure
- No
- Primary statute
- Imminent & Substantial Endangerment Order
Sourced verbatim from EPA ECHO Enforcement Case Report for case 05-1994-0171 . Bulk data: ICIS-FEC download summary.
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.