EPA v. HERITAGE ENV SERVICES -- IN
EPA Did Not Pursue
Case summary
THIS IS AN OFFSITE POLICY COMPLIANCE MATTER. RESPONDENT OPERATES A HAZARDOUS WASTE TREATMENT FACILITY IN INDIANAPOLIS, INDIANA. ON JULY 14, 1992, IDEM SENT RESPONDENT A VIOLATION LETTER BASED ON FACILITY INSPECTIONS ON 5.14 AND 6.16.92. VIOLATIONS NOTED WERE FAILURE TO SUBMIT A COPY OF A WASTE MANIFEST TO THE GENERATOR, AND PLACEMENT OF INCOMPATIBLE WASTES IN A SINGLE TANK SYSTEM, RESULTING IN A RELEASE OF NITROGEN OXIDES. AFTER RESPONDENT REPLIED TO IDEM WITH A DESCRIPTION OF THE MEASURES IT TOOK, IDEM NOTIFIED RESPONDENT ON 10.5.92 THAT ITS RESPONSE TO THE INCOMPATIBLE WASTE VIOLATION WAS INSUFFICIENT. ON OCTOBER 14, 1992, U.S. EPA NOTIFIED RESPONDENT THAT IT HAD BEEN DETERMINED TO BE UNACCEPTABLE FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFSITE WASTES GENERATED IN RESPONSE ACTIONS UNDER CERCLA.
Facilities (1)
WAUCONDA SAND & GRAVEL
BONNER & GARLAND RD, WAUCONDA, IL, 60084
Registry ID: 110009327022
Statutes cited
- RCRA 3013 — Monitoring, Analysis, Testing
Timeline (4 milestones)
- 1992-10-14Enforcement Action Data Entered
- 1992-10-14Complaint Filed/Proposed Order
- 1994-02-08Final Order Issued
- 1994-02-08Enforcement Action Closed
Case metadata
- EPA activity ID
- 28494
- Case number
- 05-1993-1263
- Lead agency
- EPA
- HQ division
- RCR
- Branch
- SWERB
- EPA region
- 05
- Multimedia
- No
- Voluntary self-disclosure
- No
- Primary statute
- Monitoring, Analysis, Testing
Sourced verbatim from EPA ECHO Enforcement Case Report for case 05-1993-1263 . Bulk data: ICIS-FEC download summary.
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.