EPA v. COSHOCTON CITY LANDFILL
Final Order With Specified Cost Recovery
Cost recovery
$22,000,000
Case summary
- ROD TO BE SIGNED IN AUGUST, 1987. - RD/RA NEGOTIATIONS PLANNED FOR JULY - OCTOBER 1987. ISSUES: 50% SITE? CITY AND GE'S CLAIMS OF TOO MUCH WORK DONE AT SITE AND OUR REFUSAL TO LET THEM TAKE OVER RI/FS.
Defendants (8)
- GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANYNamed in complaintNamed in settlement
- EXCELLO ABRIC FINISHERS, INC.Named in complaintNamed in settlement
- SHAW-BARTON, INCNamed in complaintNamed in settlement
- STEEL CEILINGS DIVISION OF AIRTEX CORP.Named in complaintNamed in settlement
- STONE CONTAINER CORP.Named in complaintNamed in settlement
- BUCKEYE FABRIC FINISHERS, INCNamed in complaintNamed in settlement
- COSHOCTON, CITY OFNamed in complaintNamed in settlement
- EDMONT-WILSONNamed in complaintNamed in settlement
Facilities (1)
COSHOCTON CITY LANDFILL
STATE RTE 83 S, COSHOCTON, OH, 43812
Registry ID: 110008586360
Statutes cited
- CERCLA 122 — Superfund
- CERCLA 107 — Superfund
Enforcement conclusions (1)
COSHOCTON, CITY OFentered 1991-07-22
Primary law: CERCLA
Timeline (5 milestones)
- 1989-12-29Referred To Dept Of Justice
- 1990-02-23Complaint Filed With Court
- 1991-07-22Final Order Lodged
- 1991-07-22Final Order Entered
- 1991-07-22Concluded
Case metadata
- EPA activity ID
- 26497
- Case number
- 05-1987-0265
- Lead agency
- EPA
- HQ division
- CER
- Branch
- SWERB
- EPA region
- 05
- Multimedia
- No
- Voluntary self-disclosure
- No
- Primary statute
- Superfund
Sourced verbatim from EPA ECHO Enforcement Case Report for case 05-1987-0265 . Bulk data: ICIS-FEC download summary.
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.