EPA v. KING MUSICAL INSTRUMENT-A/K/A/ UNITED MUSICAL INSTRUMENTS
Source Agrees
Penalty assessed
$6,450
Case summary
ADMINISTRATIVE COMPLAINT UNDER RCRA FOR VARIOUS VIOLATIONS OF THE IMPLEMENTING REGULATIONS. MAJOR THRUST OF ACTION IS TO ASSESS PENALTY AND REQUIRE CLOSURE OF TWO SURFACE IM- POUNDMENTS THAT WERE OPERATED WITHOUT A PERMIT AND WITHOUT OBTAINING INTERIM STATUS . RESPONDENT HAS FILED ITS ANSWER ADMITTING MOST OF THE FACT- UAL ALLEGATIONS. THE ONLY MATERIAL ISSUE IS THE AMOUNT OF CIVIL PENALTY TO BE ASSESSED.
Defendants (2)
- WEIL, FREIBERG, THOMASNamed in complaintNamed in settlement
- WEIL, FREIBERG, THOMAS UNITED MUSICAL INNamed in complaintNamed in settlement
Facilities (1)
UNITED MUSICAL INSTRUMENTS, U.S.A.,INC
33999 CURTIS, EASTLAKE, OH, 44094
Registry ID: 110000386341
Statutes cited
- RCRA 3005 — Permits for Treatment, Storage, or Disposal of Hazardous Waste
- RCRA 3008 — Res Conserv & Rec Act
Enforcement conclusions (1)
KING MUSICAL INSTRUMENT-A/K/A/ UNITED MUSICAL INST
Primary law: RCRA
Federal penalty: $6,450
Timeline (4 milestones)
- 1986-09-12Enforcement Action Data Entered
- 1986-09-12Complaint Filed/Proposed Order
- 1987-05-04Enforcement Action Closed
- 1988-01-30Compliance Achieved
Case metadata
- EPA activity ID
- 26145
- Case number
- 05-1986-0349
- Lead agency
- EPA
- HQ division
- RCR
- EPA region
- 05
- Multimedia
- No
- Voluntary self-disclosure
- No
- Primary statute
- Permits for Treatment, Storage, or Disposal of Hazardous Waste
Sourced verbatim from EPA ECHO Enforcement Case Report for case 05-1986-0349 . Bulk data: ICIS-FEC download summary.
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.