EPA v. INVICTA WATCH COMPANY OF AMERICA
Unilateral Administrative Order Without Adjudication
Case summary
JANUARY 4, 2023 - NOTICE OF REFUSAL OF ADMISSION FIFRA 12(a)(1)(F): To sell or distribute a pesticide device that is misbranded. Specifically, the device does not appear to be labeled in accordance with FIFRA 2(q)(1). The product label appears to include claims that are false or misleading in relation to the efficacy of the product. Please note that the terms sanitize, disinfect and sterilize have separate meanings under FIFRA regarding a products effectiveness as a pesticide or device. See below and the resources previously provided to the broker for additional information in regards to making pesticidal claims.
Defendants (1)
- INVICTA WATCH COMPANY OF AMERICANamed in settlement
Facilities (1)
INVICTA WATCH COMPANY OF AMERICA
3069 TAFT STREET, HOLLYWOOD, FL, 33021
Registry ID: 110044877531
Statutes cited
- FIFRA 12A1F — Device Misbranded
Enforcement conclusions (1)
INVICTA WATCH COMPANY OF AMERICAentered 2023-01-04
Primary law: FIFRA
Timeline (3 milestones)
- 2023-01-04Final Order Issued
- 2023-01-04Enforcement Action Closed
- 2023-01-26Enforcement Action Data Entered
Case metadata
- EPA activity ID
- 3603485313
- Case number
- 04-2023-1229
- Lead agency
- EPA
- EPA region
- 04
- Voluntary self-disclosure
- No
- Primary statute
- Device Misbranded
Sourced verbatim from EPA ECHO Enforcement Case Report for case 04-2023-1229 . Bulk data: ICIS-FEC download summary.
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.