Skip to main content
04-2023-1213Administrative - FormalClosedFY 2023· Region 04

EPA v. SHARP ELECTRONICS CORPORATION

Unilateral Administrative Order Without Adjudication

Case summary

NOVEMBER 30, 2022 - NOTICE OF REFUSAL OF ADMISSION FIFRA 12(a)(1)(F): To sell or distribute a pesticide device that is misbranded. The device is not labeled in accordance with FIFRA 2(q)(1) in that it contains claims considered false or misleading. Specifically, the product manual states the device can be used to control germs, but does not qualify the claim with the microorganisms encompassed by the term and which were used in testing the efficacy of the product. The claim appears misleading because it implies the product is effective against all pathogenic microorganisms that fit within the general term germs.

Defendants (1)

  • SHARP ELECTRONICS CORPORATIONNamed in settlement

Facilities (1)

  • SHARP ELECTRONICS CORPORATION

    100 PARAGON DR, MONTVALE, NJ, 07645

    Registry ID: 110069998911

Statutes cited

  • FIFRA 12A1FDevice Misbranded

Enforcement conclusions (1)

  • SHARP ELECTRONICS CORPORATIONentered 2022-11-30

    Primary law: FIFRA

Timeline (3 milestones)

  • 2022-11-30Enforcement Action Closed
  • 2022-11-30Final Order Issued
  • 2022-12-08Enforcement Action Data Entered

Case metadata

EPA activity ID
3603445998
Case number
04-2023-1213
Lead agency
EPA
EPA region
04
Voluntary self-disclosure
No
Primary statute
Device Misbranded

Sourced verbatim from EPA ECHO Enforcement Case Report for case 04-2023-1213 . Bulk data: ICIS-FEC download summary.

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.