EPA v. SHARP ELECTRONICS CORPORATION
Unilateral Administrative Order Without Adjudication
Case summary
NOVEMBER 30, 2022 - NOTICE OF REFUSAL OF ADMISSION FIFRA 12(a)(1)(F): To sell or distribute a pesticide device that is misbranded. The device is not labeled in accordance with FIFRA 2(q)(1) in that it contains claims considered false or misleading. Specifically, the product manual states the device can be used to control germs, but does not qualify the claim with the microorganisms encompassed by the term and which were used in testing the efficacy of the product. The claim appears misleading because it implies the product is effective against all pathogenic microorganisms that fit within the general term germs.
Defendants (1)
- SHARP ELECTRONICS CORPORATIONNamed in settlement
Facilities (1)
SHARP ELECTRONICS CORPORATION
100 PARAGON DR, MONTVALE, NJ, 07645
Registry ID: 110069998911
Statutes cited
- FIFRA 12A1F — Device Misbranded
Enforcement conclusions (1)
SHARP ELECTRONICS CORPORATIONentered 2022-11-30
Primary law: FIFRA
Timeline (3 milestones)
- 2022-11-30Enforcement Action Closed
- 2022-11-30Final Order Issued
- 2022-12-08Enforcement Action Data Entered
Case metadata
- EPA activity ID
- 3603445998
- Case number
- 04-2023-1213
- Lead agency
- EPA
- EPA region
- 04
- Voluntary self-disclosure
- No
- Primary statute
- Device Misbranded
Sourced verbatim from EPA ECHO Enforcement Case Report for case 04-2023-1213 . Bulk data: ICIS-FEC download summary.
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.