EPA v. BIRDIEBOX, LLC
Unilateral Administrative Order Without Adjudication
Case summary
JUNE 9, 2022 - NOTICE OF REFUSAL OF ADMISSION FIFRA 12(a)(1)(F): To sell or distribute a pesticide device that is misbranded. Specifically, the device is not labeled in accordance with FIFRA 2(q)(1) in that the packaging for the product, as it is customarily sold or distributed, does not appear to have all required label components, including the EPA Est. No., producer or manufactured for information, precautionary language, or directions for use or reference to accompanying directions for use. Additionally, the product label appears to include claims that are false or misleading in relation to the efficacy of the product, which are prohibited pursuant to FIFRA 2(q)(1)(A) and 40 CFR 156.10(a)(5).
Defendants (1)
- BIRDIEBOX, LLCNamed in settlement
Facilities (1)
BIRDIEBOX, LLC
4141 NE 2ND AVENUE SUITE 203B, MIAMI, FL, 33137
Registry ID: 110071293454
Statutes cited
- FIFRA 12A1F — Device Misbranded
Enforcement conclusions (1)
BIRDIEBOX, LLCentered 2022-06-09
Primary law: FIFRA
Timeline (3 milestones)
- 2022-06-09Enforcement Action Closed
- 2022-06-09Final Order Issued
- 2022-06-24Enforcement Action Data Entered
Case metadata
- EPA activity ID
- 3603261771
- Case number
- 04-2022-1278
- Lead agency
- EPA
- EPA region
- 04
- Voluntary self-disclosure
- No
- Primary statute
- Device Misbranded
Sourced verbatim from EPA ECHO Enforcement Case Report for case 04-2022-1278 . Bulk data: ICIS-FEC download summary.
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.