EPA v. AERUS LLC DBA ACTIVE PURE

Case summary

SEPTEMBER 7, 2021 - NOTICE OF REFUSAL OF ADMISSION FIFRA 12(a)(1)(F) To sell or distribute a pesticide device that is misbranded. Specifically, the device is not labelled in accordance with FIFRA Section 2(q)(1) in that the EPA Establishment number for where production last occurred was not on the product label preceded by the phrase EPA Est. Additionally, the product label or labeling appeared false or misleading claims or statements. These included: Claims of heightened efficacy; Reference by statement or graphics to a federal agency in a manner that may directly or indirectly imply an endorsement; Non-quantitative or comparative safety claims; Statements that state, imply or suggest that the product can or will prevent or control disease or offer health protection.

Defendants (1)

• AERUS LLC DBA ACTIVE PURENamed in settlement

Facilities (1)

• ACTIVE PURE TECHNOLOGIES LLC DBA AERUS LLC

  14841 DALLAS PARKWAY, SUITE 500, DALLAS, TX, 75254

  Registry ID: 110071063822

Statutes cited

• FIFRA 12A1F — Device Misbranded

Enforcement conclusions (1)

• AERUS LLC DBA ACTIVE PUREentered 2021-09-07

  Primary law: FIFRA

Timeline (3 milestones)

• 2021-09-07Final Order Issued
• 2021-09-07Enforcement Action Closed
• 2021-09-15Enforcement Action Data Entered