EPA v. FAR UV TECHNOLOGIES

Case summary

JUNE 2, 2021 - NOTICE OF REFUSAL OF ADMISSION FIFRA 12(a)(2)(N) Failure to file reports required by the Act for the UV lamp being imported. The importer or the importer's agent did not file a Notice of Arrival of Pesticide and Devices (NOA) EPA Form 3540-1 prior to the arrival of the shipment in the U.S. or an electronic alternative to the NOA, filed with the entry documentation, via any U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) authorized electronic data interchange system. The product labels were not provided. FIFRA 12(a)(1)(F) To sell or distribute a pesticide device that is misbranded. Specifically, the device is not labelled in accordance with FIFRA Section 2(q)(1) in that the label did not include an EPA Est. No.

Defendants (1)

• FAR UV TECHNOLOGIES INCNamed in settlement

Facilities (1)

• FAR UV TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

  7208 WORNALL RD, KANSAS CITY, MO, 64114

  Registry ID: 110070716338

Statutes cited

• FIFRA 12A1F — Device Misbranded
• FIFRA 12A2N — Failure to File Reports

Enforcement conclusions (1)

• FAR UV TECHNOLOGIESentered 2021-06-02

  Primary law: FIFRA

Timeline (3 milestones)

• 2021-06-02Enforcement Action Closed
• 2021-06-02Final Order Issued
• 2021-06-03Enforcement Action Data Entered