EPA v. AMBUSH MOSQUITO TRAPS PTY, LTD
Unilateral Administrative Order Without Adjudication
Case summary
8/3/2020 - NOTICE OF REFUSAL OF ADMISSION IT APPEARS THAT THE PRODUCT IS NOT IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE ACT AND IS SUBJECT TO REFUSAL OF ADMISSION DUE TO THE FOLLOWING VIOLATION(S): FIFRA 12(A)(1)(F) THE PRODUCT DOES NOT APPEAR TO BE LABELED WITH THE EPA ESTABLISHMENT NUMBER OF THE MANUFACTURER AND MAKES MULTIPLE SAFETY CLAIMS SUCH AS THE AMBUSH TRAP DOES NOT INVOLVE SPRAYING PESTICIDES, REPELLENTS, CITRONELLA, COILS, OR CANDLES. THE TRAP DOES NOT USE DANGEROUS CHEMICALS KNOWN TO BE HARMFUL TO BOTH HUMANS AND THE ENVIRONMENT. THE AMBUSH MOSQUITO TRAP USES SAFE WAYS TO CATCH AND KILL MOSQUITOS , ?INSECTICIDE FREE?, AND ECOFRIENDLY .
Defendants (1)
- AMBUSH MOSQUITO TRAPS PTY, LTDNamed in settlement
Facilities (1)
AMBUSH MOSQUITO TRAPS PTY, LTD
1401 POPLAR LANE, NASHVILLE, TN, 37210
Registry ID: 110070836346
Statutes cited
- FIFRA 12A1F — Device Misbranded
Enforcement conclusions (1)
AMBUSH MOSQUITO TRAPS PTY, LTDentered 2020-08-03
Primary law: FIFRA
Timeline (3 milestones)
- 2020-08-03Final Order Issued
- 2020-08-03Enforcement Action Closed
- 2020-09-23Enforcement Action Data Entered
Case metadata
- EPA activity ID
- 3602291983
- Case number
- 04-2020-1402
- Lead agency
- EPA
- EPA region
- 04
- Voluntary self-disclosure
- No
- Primary statute
- Device Misbranded
Sourced verbatim from EPA ECHO Enforcement Case Report for case 04-2020-1402 . Bulk data: ICIS-FEC download summary.
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.