EPA v. UPS BROKERAGE - SDF
Unilateral Administrative Order Without Adjudication
Case summary
4/29/2020 - NOTICE OF REFUSAL OF ADMISSION VIOLATIONS: FIFRA SECTION 12(a)(1)(F) - TO SELL OR DISTRIBUTE A PESTICIDE DEVICE WHICH IS MISBRANDED. BASED ON THE LABEL COPY PROVIDED, THE DEVICE DOES NOT APPEARS TO BE IS LABELLED IN ACCORDANCE WITH FIFRA SECTION 2(q)(1) IN THAT THE PRODUCT DOES NOT APPEAR TO INCLUDE AN EPA ESTABLISHMENT NUMBER DIRECTIONS OR DIRECTIONS FOR USE WHICH, IF COMPLIED WITH, ARE ADEQUATE TO PROTECT HEALTH AND THE ENVIRONMENT. ADDITIONALLY, THE PRODUCT LABEL APPEARS TO CONTAIN STATEMENTS THAT MAY BE FALSE OR MISLEADING CONCERNING THE EFFECTIVENESS OF THE PRODUCT AS A PESTICIDE DEVICE AND NON-NUMERICAL AND/OR COMPARATIVE STATEMENTS ON THE SAFETY OF THE PRODUCT.
Defendants (2)
- FUZHOU XINGDESHENG COMPANY, LTDNamed in settlement
- UPS BROKERAGE - SDFNamed in settlement
Facilities (1)
UPS SUPPLY CHAIN SOLUTIONS, INC.
1930 BISHOP LANE, SUITE 200, LOUISVILLE, KY, 40218
Registry ID: 110070814772
Statutes cited
- FIFRA 12A2F — Restricted Usage
Enforcement conclusions (1)
UPS BROKERAGE - SDFentered 2020-04-29
Primary law: FIFRA
Timeline (3 milestones)
- 2020-04-29Final Order Issued
- 2020-04-29Enforcement Action Closed
- 2020-06-17Enforcement Action Data Entered
Case metadata
- EPA activity ID
- 3602219039
- Case number
- 04-2020-1286
- Lead agency
- EPA
- EPA region
- 04
- Voluntary self-disclosure
- No
- Primary statute
- Restricted Usage
Sourced verbatim from EPA ECHO Enforcement Case Report for case 04-2020-1286 . Bulk data: ICIS-FEC download summary.
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.