EPA v. DZYNE TECHNOLOGIES, INC (COVID-19)

Case summary

DECEMBER 14, 2020 - NOTICE OF WARNING ISSUED Upon review of a copy of the label that was uploaded into the ACE Document Image System, the EPA determined that the lamps were misbranded due to the absence of an EPA Establishment Number. Pursuant 40 C.F.R.156.10(a) and Section 2(q)(1)(A) of FIFRA, a pesticide or a device declared subject to FIFRA pursuant to 40 C.F.R. 152.500, is misbranded if its labeling does not include the producing establishment number. Pursuant to FIFRA Section 12(a)(1)(F), 7 U.S.C.136j (a)(1)(F), it is unlawful for any person in any State to distribute or sell any device which is misbranded. Further, an entry was not filed, prior to the import of this product. Pursuant to FIFRA 12(a)(2)(N), 7 U.S.C. 136j(a)(2)(N), it is unlawful for any person to fail to file reports required by the Act.

Defendants (1)

• DZYNE TECHNOLOGIES, INCNamed in settlement

Facilities (1)

• DZYNE TECHNOLOGIES, INC

  11 VANDERBILT, IRVINE, CA, 92618

  Registry ID: 110070653585

Statutes cited

• FIFRA 12A2N — Failure to File Reports
• FIFRA 12A1F — Device Misbranded

Enforcement conclusions (1)

• DZYNE TECHNOLOGIES, INC (COVID)entered 2020-12-14

  Primary law: FIFRA

Timeline (3 milestones)

• 2020-12-14Final Order Issued
• 2020-12-14Enforcement Action Closed
• 2021-01-11Enforcement Action Data Entered