EPA v. ONE CONVENIENT STOP 2

Case summary

10/1/2014 - UST FIELD CITATION FOR EXPEDITED SETTLEMENT ISSUED, ASSESSING A PENALTY OF $1,260. RESPONDENT FAILED TO ENSURE PROPER OPERATION OFTHE CATHODIC PROTECTION SYSTEM. IN VIOLATION OF 40 CFR SECTION 280.31(b). RESPONDENT FAILED TO INSPECT IMPRESSED CURRENT SYSTEM EVERY 60 DAYS. IN VIOLATION OF 40 CFR SECTION 280.31(c). RESPONDENT FAILED TO PROVIDE AN ADEQUATE RELEASE DETECTION METHOD. IN VIOLATION OF 40 CFR SECTION 280.40(a). RESPONDENT FAILED TO PROVIDE ANY RELEASE DETECTION FOR PIPING. IN VIOLATION OF 40 CFR SECTION 280.44.

Defendants (2)

• ONE CONVENIENT STOP #2 (SB)Named in complaintNamed in settlement
• TOMMY PATEL (SB)Named in complaintNamed in settlement

Facilities (1)

• ONE CONVENIENT STOP

  1413 HWY 93 SOUTH, CAIRO, GA, 39828

  Registry ID: 110058292048

Statutes cited

• RCRA 9006D — UST Civil Penalties

Enforcement conclusions (1)

• ONE CONVENIENT STOP 2entered 2014-10-06

  Primary law: RCRA

  Federal penalty: $1,260

Timeline (4 milestones)

• 2014-10-06Enforcement Action Closed
• 2014-10-06Final Order Issued
• 2014-10-06Complaint Filed/Proposed Order
• 2014-11-03Enforcement Action Data Entered