EPA v. PROSTAR COLLISION

Case summary

10/28/14 - COMPLIANCE ORDER ISSUED. ALLEGATIONS: RESPONDENT OWNS AND OPERATES A MOTOR VEHICLE OR MOBILE EQUIPMENT SURFACE COATING OPERATION THAT USES MECHANICAL METHODS OF STRIPPING PAINT FROM PLASTIC, METAL, AND FIBERGLASS SUBSTRATES. ACCORDING TO THE INITIAL NOTIFICATION SUBMITTED BY RESPONDENT, RESPONDENT IS AN EXISTING SOURCE PURSUANT TO 40 CFR 63.11171 AND IS SUBJECT TO SUBPART 6H. PURSUANT TO 40 CFR 63.11175(b), AN EXISTNG AREA SOURCE SUBJECT TO SUBPART 6H MUST SUBMIT A NOTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE STATUS ON OR BEFORE MARCH 11, 2011. THE SOURCE IS REQUIRED TO SUBMIT THE INFORMATION SPECIFIED IN 40 CFR 63.11175(b)(1) THROUGH (4). ACCORDING TO EPA RECORDS, AS OF SEPT 30, 2014, RESPONDENT HAS NOT SUBMITTED THE NOTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE STATUS TO THE DIRECTOR OF THE AIR, PESTICIDES AND TOXIC MANAGEMENT DIV OF EPA, REGION 4. RESPONDENT'S FAILURE TO SUBMIT THE NOTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE STATUS TO THE DIRECTOR OF THE AIR, PESTICIDES AND TOXICS MANAGEMENT DIV OF EPA, REGION 4 CONSTITUTES A VIOLATION OF 6H AND THE CAA. ORDER: RESPONDENT SHALL SUBMIT TO THE DIRECTOR OF THE AIR, PESTICIDES AND TOXICS MANAGEMENT DIV OF EPA, REGION 4, A NOTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE STATUS IN ACCORDANCE WITH 40 CFR 63.11175(b) WITHIN 14 CALENDAR DAYS.

Defendants (1)

• PROSTAR COLLISION (SB)Named in settlement

Facilities (1)

• PROSTAR COLLISION

  8655 PHILIPS HWY, JACKSONVILLE, FL, 322568212

  Registry ID: 110063215177

Statutes cited

• CAA 112 — Hazardous Air Pollutants

Enforcement conclusions (1)

• PROSTAR COLLISIONentered 2014-10-28

  Primary law: CAA

Timeline (2 milestones)

• 2014-10-28Final Order Issued
• 2014-12-10Enforcement Action Data Entered