EPA v. MICCOSUKEE SERVICE PLAZA

Case summary

12/5/2011 - ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER ISSUED. ORDER STATES: RESPONDENT VIOLATED THE SDWA AND ITS IMPLEMENTING REGULATIONS AT THE SYSTEM BY FAILING TO COMPLY WITH THE MAXIMUM CONTAINMENT LEVELS (MCLs) FOR TOTAL TRIHALOMETHANES (TTHM) AND FAILING TO COMPLY WITH TREATMENT TECHNIQUES (TT) ASSOCIATED WITH LEAD AND COPPER ACTION LEVEL (AL) EXCEEDANCES IN ACCORDANCE WITH 40 CFR SECTIONS 141.64, .81, -.83, .85, .87, .130, .132,- .133. ORDER REQUIRES: RESPONDENT SHALL PROVIDE A RECOMMENDATION FOR OPTIMAL CORROSION CONTROL TREATMENT AT THE SYSTEM WITHIN THIRTY (30) DAYS FROM THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THIS ORDER, IN ACCORDANCE WITH 40 CFR SECTION 141.81(e)(1). RESPONDENT SHALL INSTALL AT THE SYSTEM OPTIMAL CORROSION CONTROL TREATMENT WITHIN SIX (6) MONTHS AFTER EPA HAS PROVIDED WRITTEN APPROVAL OF THE RECOMMENDED TREATMENT OPTIONS(S) IN ACCORDANCE WITH 40 CFR SECTION 141.81(e)(2). RESPONDENT SHALL CONTINUE TO MONITOR FOR WATER QUALITY PARAMETERS IN ACCORDANCE WITH 40 CFR SECTION 141.87 BY TAKING TWO SAMPLES FROM EACH OF TWO TAP SITES AND THE ENTRY POINT TO THE DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM, AFTER TREATMENT, DURING EACH MONITORING PERIOD.

Defendants (1)

• MICCOSUKEE TRIBE OF INDIANS OF FLORIDANamed in settlement

Facilities (1)

• MICCOSUKEE SERVICE PLAZA

  47801 WEST STATE RD., FT. LAUDERDALE, FL, 33327

  Registry ID: 110024267434

Statutes cited

• SDWA 1412/1414 — National Drinking Water Regulations

Enforcement conclusions (1)

• MICCOSUKEE SERVICE PLAZAentered 2011-12-05

  Primary law: SDWA

Timeline (2 milestones)

• 2011-12-05Final Order Issued
• 2011-12-22Enforcement Action Data Entered