EPA v. HIGHLANDS EXPRESS
Final Order With Penalty
Case summary
10/5/2010 - UST FIELD CITATION FOR EXPEDITED SETTLEMENT ISSUED, ASSESSING A PENALTY OF $1,050. CITATION STATES: RESPONDENT FAILED TO PROVIDE ADEQUATE LINE LEAK DETECTOR SYSTEM FOR UNDERGROUND PIPING. IN VIOLATION OF 40 CFR 280.44(a). RESPONDENT FAILED TO PROVIDE AN OVERFILL PREVENTION SYSTEM FOR AN EXISTING TANK. IN VIOLATION OF 40 CFR 280.21(d). RESPONDENT FAILED TO ENSURE PROPER OPERATION OF CATHODIC PROTECTION SYSTEM. IN VIOLATION OF 40 CFR 280.31(b). RESPONDENT FAILED TO INSPECT IMPRESSED CURRENT SYSTEMS EVERY 60 DAYS. IN VIOLATION OF 40 CFR 280.31(c).
Defendants (1)
- HIGHLANDS EXPRESS (SB)Named in complaintNamed in settlement
Facilities (1)
HIGHLANDS EXPRESS
115 FRANKLIN ROAD, HIGHLANDS, NC, 28741
Registry ID: 110018658736
Statutes cited
- RCRA 9006D — UST Civil Penalties
Enforcement conclusions (1)
HIGHLANDS EXPRESSentered 2010-10-05
Primary law: RCRA
Federal penalty: $1,050
Timeline (4 milestones)
- 2010-10-05Complaint Filed/Proposed Order
- 2010-10-05Final Order Issued
- 2010-10-06Enforcement Action Closed
- 2010-10-29Enforcement Action Data Entered
Case metadata
- EPA activity ID
- 2200024290
- Case number
- 04-2011-9808
- Lead agency
- EPA
- EPA region
- 04
- Voluntary self-disclosure
- No
- Primary statute
- UST Civil Penalties
Sourced verbatim from EPA ECHO Enforcement Case Report for case 04-2011-9808 . Bulk data: ICIS-FEC download summary.
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.