Skip to main content
04-2011-9808Administrative - FormalClosedFY 2011· Region 04

EPA v. HIGHLANDS EXPRESS

Final Order With Penalty

Case summary

10/5/2010 - UST FIELD CITATION FOR EXPEDITED SETTLEMENT ISSUED, ASSESSING A PENALTY OF $1,050. CITATION STATES: RESPONDENT FAILED TO PROVIDE ADEQUATE LINE LEAK DETECTOR SYSTEM FOR UNDERGROUND PIPING. IN VIOLATION OF 40 CFR 280.44(a). RESPONDENT FAILED TO PROVIDE AN OVERFILL PREVENTION SYSTEM FOR AN EXISTING TANK. IN VIOLATION OF 40 CFR 280.21(d). RESPONDENT FAILED TO ENSURE PROPER OPERATION OF CATHODIC PROTECTION SYSTEM. IN VIOLATION OF 40 CFR 280.31(b). RESPONDENT FAILED TO INSPECT IMPRESSED CURRENT SYSTEMS EVERY 60 DAYS. IN VIOLATION OF 40 CFR 280.31(c).

Defendants (1)

  • HIGHLANDS EXPRESS (SB)Named in complaintNamed in settlement

Facilities (1)

  • HIGHLANDS EXPRESS

    115 FRANKLIN ROAD, HIGHLANDS, NC, 28741

    Registry ID: 110018658736

Statutes cited

  • RCRA 9006DUST Civil Penalties

Enforcement conclusions (1)

  • HIGHLANDS EXPRESSentered 2010-10-05

    Primary law: RCRA

    Federal penalty: $1,050

Timeline (4 milestones)

  • 2010-10-05Complaint Filed/Proposed Order
  • 2010-10-05Final Order Issued
  • 2010-10-06Enforcement Action Closed
  • 2010-10-29Enforcement Action Data Entered

Case metadata

EPA activity ID
2200024290
Case number
04-2011-9808
Lead agency
EPA
EPA region
04
Voluntary self-disclosure
No
Primary statute
UST Civil Penalties

Sourced verbatim from EPA ECHO Enforcement Case Report for case 04-2011-9808 . Bulk data: ICIS-FEC download summary.

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.