EPA v. HARPETH VALLEY UTILITY DISTRICT - TENNESSEE
Final Order No Penalty
Case summary
09/30/2011 - ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER ON CONSENT ISSUED. RECEIVED (EFFECTIVE) DATE 10/24/2011. RESPONDENT HAS VIOLATED CWA 301(a) IN THAT THE RESPONDENT HAS DISCHARGED UNTREATED WASTEWATER CONTAINING POLLUTANTS TO THE WATERS OF THE U.S. AT LOCATIONS NOT AUTHORIZED BY AN NPDES PERMIT. THE RESPONDENT HAS VIOLATED PART 2.1.4 OF ITS NPDES PERMIT, ISSUED PURSUANT TO CWA 402 BY FAILING TO PROPERLY OPERATE AND MAINTAIN ITS WCTS RESULTING IN SSOs FROM THE WCTS. RESPONDENT SHALL DEVELOP THE MANAGEMENT, OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE (MOM) PROGRAMS REQUIRED IN THE ORDER.
Defendants (2)
- HARPETH VALLEY UTILITIES DISTRICT OF DAVIDSONNamed in settlement
- HARPETH VALLEY UTILITIES DISTRICT OF WILLIAMSON CONamed in settlement
Facilities (1)
HARPETH VALLEY UTILITY DISTRICT STP
4063 OLD HICKORY BLVD., NASHVILLE, TN, 37221
Registry ID: 110006553924
Statutes cited
- CWA 301/402 — NPDES Permit Violations
Enforcement conclusions (1)
HARPETH VALLEY UTILITY DISTRICT - TENNESSEEentered 2011-10-24
Primary law: CWA
Timeline (4 milestones)
- 2011-09-30Enforcement Action Data Entered
- 2011-10-24Final Order Issued
- 2014-11-24NPDES Closed
- 2014-11-24Enforcement Action Closed
Case metadata
- EPA activity ID
- 2600059569
- Case number
- 04-2011-4782
- Lead agency
- EPA
- EPA region
- 04
- Voluntary self-disclosure
- No
- Primary statute
- NPDES Permit Violations
Sourced verbatim from EPA ECHO Enforcement Case Report for case 04-2011-4782 . Bulk data: ICIS-FEC download summary.
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.