EPA v. GAINO CORPORATION
Final Order With Penalty
Case summary
4/13/2011 - CONSENT AGREEMENT AND FINAL ORDER ISSUED, ASSESSING A PENALTY OF $100. ORDER ALLEGES: ON OR ABOUT OCTOBER 13, 2009 AND OCTOBER 15, 2009, AN AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE OF THE EPA CONDUCTED INSPECTIONS AT RESPONDENT'S FACILITY. DURING THE AFOREMENTIONED INSPECTION, AP GOLDSHIELD 5, EPA REGISTRATION NUMBER 85556-00, AND AP GOLDSHIELD 75, EPA REGISTRATION NUMBER 85556-001, WERE IDENTIFIED AS BEING REPACKAGED AND DISTRIBUTED BY THE RESPONDENT. AT THE TIME OF THE INSPECTION, AP GOLDSHIELD 5, AND AP GOLDSHIELD 75 WERE MISBRANDED IN THAT THE LABEL ON THE PESTICIDE CONTAINERS BORE INCORRECT ESTABLISHMENT NUMBERS. RESPONDENT SECTION SECTION 12(a)(1)(E) OF FIFRA, ON AT LEAST THIRTEEN OCCASIONS.
Defendants (1)
- GAINO CORPORATION (SB)Named in complaintNamed in settlement
Facilities (1)
GAINO CORP
349 HUNTINGTON ROAD, GAFFNEY, SC, 29341
Registry ID: 110038261136
Statutes cited
- FIFRA 12A1E — Adulterated/Misbranded
Enforcement conclusions (1)
GAINO CORPORATIONentered 2011-04-13
Primary law: FIFRA
Federal penalty: $100
Timeline (4 milestones)
- 2011-04-13Complaint Filed/Proposed Order
- 2011-04-13Final Order Issued
- 2011-04-26Enforcement Action Closed
- 2011-05-10Enforcement Action Data Entered
Case metadata
- EPA activity ID
- 2600018733
- Case number
- 04-2011-3011
- Lead agency
- EPA
- EPA region
- 04
- Voluntary self-disclosure
- No
- Primary statute
- Adulterated/Misbranded
Sourced verbatim from EPA ECHO Enforcement Case Report for case 04-2011-3011 . Bulk data: ICIS-FEC download summary.
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.