EPA v. METTLER TOLEDO SAFELINE, INC.
Source Agrees
Case summary
1/12/12 - NOTICE OF DETERMINATION ISSUED. ON NOV 23, 2009, METTLER SUBMITTED ITS SELF-DISCLOSURE TO EPA IN WHICH IT DISCLOSED THAT IT HAD COMMITTED 3 VIOLATIONS OF EPCRA 313 AT ITS TAMPA, FL FACILITY, BY FAILING TO SUBMIT A TRI FORM 4 FOR CALENDAR YEAR 2004 FOR CHROMIUM AND BY FAILING TO SUBMIT A TRI FORM R FOR CALENDAR YEAR 2006 FOR CHROMIUM AND NICKEL. THE SELF-DISCLOSURE STATED THAT DURING 2004 AND 2006, CHROMIUM WAS USED AT THE FACILITY IN QUANTITIES EXCEEDING THE REPORTING THRESHOLD, AND IN 2006, NICKEL WAS USED AT THE FACILITY IN QUANTITIES EXCEEDING THE REPORTING THRESHOLD, BUT METTLER FAILED TO INCLUDE THOSE CHEMICALS ON ITS FORM R RI REPORTS AS REQUIRED BY EPCRA 313.
Defendants (1)
- METTLIER TOLEDO SAFELINE, INC.Named in settlement
Facilities (1)
METTLER TOLEDO SAFELINE INC
6005 BENJAMIN RD, TAMPA, FL, 33634
Registry ID: 110037071860
Statutes cited
- EPCRA 313 — Toxic Chemical Release Reporting (TRI)
Enforcement conclusions (1)
METTLER TOLEDO SAFELINE, INC.entered 2012-01-12
Primary law: EPCRA
Timeline (3 milestones)
- 2012-01-12Enforcement Action Closed
- 2012-01-12Final Order Issued
- 2012-02-29Enforcement Action Data Entered
Case metadata
- EPA activity ID
- 2600104612
- Case number
- 04-2010-9110
- Lead agency
- EPA
- EPA region
- 04
- Voluntary self-disclosure
- Yes
- Primary statute
- Toxic Chemical Release Reporting (TRI)
Sourced verbatim from EPA ECHO Enforcement Case Report for case 04-2010-9110 . Bulk data: ICIS-FEC download summary.
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.