EPA v. KANCHANLAL PATEL (SUPER MART)

Case summary

7/18/2008 - COMPLAINT AND COMPLIANCE ORDER ISSUED, PROPOSING A PENALTY OF $47,728. ORDER ALLEGES: AT THE TIME OF INSPECTION, RESPONDENT WAS UTILIZING ANY RELEASE DETECTION METHOD FOR THREE USTs AT FACILITY 1. COUNT- RESPONDENT FAILED TO COMPLY WITH THE UST RELEASE DETECTION REQUIREMENTS AT FACILITY #1. AT THE TIME OF THE INPSECTION, RESPONDENT WAS NOT UTILIZING ANY RELEASE DETECTION METHOD FOR THE UNDERGROUND PIPING THAT ROUTINELY CONTAINED REGULATED SUBSTANCES AND WAS CONNECTED TO HIS THREE USTs AT FACILITY #1. COUNT 3 - AT THE TIME OF THE INSPECTION, RESPONDENT HAD NOT PERFORMED THE REQUIRED TESTING FOR CATHODIC PROTECTION ON HIS THREE USTs AT FACILITY #1. RESPONDENT FAILED TO COMPLY WITH CATHODIC PROTECTION REQUIREMENTS AT FACILITY #1. COUNT 4 - AT THE TIME OF INSPECTION, RESPONDENT WAS NOT UTILIZING OVERFILL PREVENTION EQUIPMENT ON HIS THREE USTs AT FACILITY #1. COUNT 5 - AT THE TIME OF THE INSPECTION, RESPONDENT WAS NOT UTLIZING ANY RELEASE DETECTION METHOD FOR HIS FIVE USTs AT FACILITY #2.

Defendants (2)

• KANCHANLAL PATELNamed in complaintNamed in settlement
• SUPER MART (SB)

Facilities (1)

• SUPER MART

  1420 US 19 S, LEESBURG, GA, 31763

  Registry ID: 110013453912

Statutes cited

• RCRA 9006D — UST Civil Penalties

Enforcement conclusions (1)

• SUPER MARTentered 2008-12-08

  Primary law: RCRA

Timeline (4 milestones)

• 2008-07-18Complaint Filed/Proposed Order
• 2008-07-25Enforcement Action Data Entered
• 2008-12-08Enforcement Action Closed
• 2008-12-08Final Order Issued