EPA v. FLURA CORP LEAKING AST SITE (ROCHE COLORADO CORP)
Final Order With Specified Cost Recovery
Case summary
10/10/06 - AGREEMENT FOR RECOVERY OF PAST RESPONSE COSTS ISSUED. SETTLING PARTY: ROCHE COLORADO CORPORATION, ARAPAHOE CHEMICALS, INC.; AND SYNTEX CHEMICALS, INC.; AND ANY OF THEIR RESPECTIVE HEIRS, SUCCESSORS OR ASSIGNS. WITHIN 10 BUSINESS DAYS AFTER SETTLING PARTY RECEIVES WRITTEN NOTICE FROM EPA THAT THIS AGREEMENT HAS BEEN SIGNED BY EPA AND APPROVED BY THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OR HIS DESIGNEE, SETTLING PARTY SHALL DEPOSIT $1,208407.63 INTO AN ESCROW ACCOUNT BEARING INTEREST ON COMMERCIALLY REASONABLE TERMS, IN A FEDERALLY-CHARTERED BANK.
Defendants (3)
- SYNTEX CHEMICALSNamed in settlement
- ARAPHOE CHEMICALS, INC.Named in settlement
- ROCHE COLORADO CORPORATIONNamed in settlement
Facilities (1)
FLURA CORPORATION LEAKING AST SITE
610 ROCK HILL ROAD, NEWPORT, TN, 37821
Registry ID: 110001862556
Statutes cited
- CERCLA 122H — Administrative Cost Recovery Settlement
Enforcement conclusions (1)
FLURA CORP LEAKING AST SITE (ROCHE COLORADO CORP)entered 2006-10-10
Primary law: CERCLA
Timeline (3 milestones)
- 2006-10-10Final Order Issued
- 2006-11-14Enforcement Action Data Entered
- 2007-01-19Enforcement Action Closed
Case metadata
- EPA activity ID
- 600019421
- Case number
- 04-2006-3764
- Lead agency
- EPA
- EPA region
- 04
- Voluntary self-disclosure
- No
- Primary statute
- Administrative Cost Recovery Settlement
Sourced verbatim from EPA ECHO Enforcement Case Report for case 04-2006-3764 . Bulk data: ICIS-FEC download summary.
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.