EPA v. DARRY CAIN (RUSSELL BALL #1)
Final Order No Penalty
Case summary
6/6/05 - ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER ON CONSENT ISSUED. ON DECEMBER 8, 2004, EPA HELD A SHOW CAUSE MEETING VIA TELEPHONE WITH TOME AND JERRY OIL COMPANY, THE PREVIOUS OWNER OF THE WELL. DURING THE SHOW CAUSE, EPA WAS INFORMED THAT THE COMPANY HAD TESTED ITS WELLS FOR MECHANICAL INTEGRITY IN THE SPRING OF 2004 AND THE WELL HAD FAILED THE TEST. TOM AND JERRY OIL COMPANY SOLD THE WELL IN THE SUMMER OF 2004 TO RESPONDENT WITHOUT REMEDIATING THE WELL. RESPONDENT HAS AGREED TO PLUG THE WELL IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE SDWA AND ITS IMPLEMENTING REGULATIONS. ORDER REQUIRES: WITHIN 90 DAYS, RESPONDENT SHALL PLUG AND ABANDON THE RUSSELL BALL #1 INJECTION WELL.
Defendants (1)
- CAIN, DARRYNamed in settlement
Facilities (1)
RUSSELL BALL #1 UIC WELL (DARRY CAIN)
LAT: 37.416667; LONG: -87.4437637, HENDERSON, KY, 42419
Registry ID: 110022872006
Statutes cited
- SDWA 1422/1423 — UIC Regulations Classes I - V
Enforcement conclusions (1)
DARRY CAIN (RUSSELL BALL #1)entered 2005-06-06
Primary law: SDWA
Timeline (2 milestones)
- 2005-06-06Final Order Issued
- 2005-06-24Enforcement Action Data Entered
Case metadata
- EPA activity ID
- 150030
- Case number
- 04-2005-1253
- Lead agency
- EPA
- EPA region
- 04
- Voluntary self-disclosure
- No
- Primary statute
- UIC Regulations Classes I - V
Sourced verbatim from EPA ECHO Enforcement Case Report for case 04-2005-1253 . Bulk data: ICIS-FEC download summary.
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.