EPA v. KANIK OIL COMPANY (E.B. ONAN #4W; C.T. NEWMAN #5 AND #6)

Case summary

1/15/04 - CAFO ISSUED, ASSESSING A ZERO PENALTY. VIOLATION 1: RESPONDENT IS IN VIOLATION OF THE SDWA AND 40 CFR 144.28(c)(2)(iv) FOR FAILURE TO DEMONSTRATE THE MECHANICAL INTEGRITY OF, OR TO PLUG AND ABANDON THE E.B. ONAN #4W, THE C.T. NEWMAN #5 AND THE C.T. NEWMAN #6 INJECTION WELLS. VIOLATION 2: RESPONDENT IS IN VIOLATION OF THE SDWA AND 40 CFR 144.28(h)(2)(i) FOR FAILURE TO SUBMIT ANNUAL MONITORING REPORTS FOR THE E.B. ONAN #4W, AND THE C.T. NEWMAN #5 AND #6 WELLS. VIOLATION 3: RESPONDENT IS IN VIOLATION OF THE SDWA AND 40 CFR 144.28(h)(2)(i) FOR FAILURE TO SUBMIT INJECTION FLUID ANALYSIS DATA FOR THE E.B. ONAN #4W, AND THE C.T. NEWMAN #5 AND #6 INJECTION WELLS

Defendants (2)

• KANIK, PETENamed in complaintNamed in settlement
• KANIK OIL COMPANY (SB)Named in complaintNamed in settlement

Facilities (1)

• KANIK OIL COMPANY (NEWMAN #5 & #6 UIC WELLS)

  MORGANFIELD CONSOLIDATED; 13-0-19, MORGANFIELD, KY, 42437

  Registry ID: 110017722026

Statutes cited

• SDWA 1422/1423 — UIC Regulations Classes I - V

Enforcement conclusions (1)

• KANIK OIL COMPANY (E.B. ONAN #4W; C.T. NEWMAN #5 AND #6)entered 2004-01-15

  Primary law: SDWA

Timeline (3 milestones)

• 2004-01-15Complaint Filed/Proposed Order
• 2004-01-15Final Order Issued
• 2004-04-03Enforcement Action Data Entered