EPA v. TEKSID ALUMINUM FOUNDRY, INC. (NOD)
Source Agrees
Case summary
NOD ISSUED 5/28/2003. RESPONDENT FAILED TO FILE A FORM R IN REPORTING YEAR 2000 FOR N120 DIISOCYANATES. IN VIOLATION OF EPCRA SECTION 313. RESPONDENT FAILED TO FILE TIER TWO INVENTORY FORMS FOR DIPHENLMETHANE 44-DIISCYANATE (00101-68-8), POLYMERIC DIPHENYLETHANE DIISOCYANATES (009016-87-9), SOLVENT-REFINED HEAVY PARAFFINIC DIISOCYANATE (064741-88-4), AND SOLVENT DEWAXED PARAFFINIC DISTILLATES (064742-65-0). IN VIOLATION OF EPCRA SECTION 312. RESPONDENT FAILED TO FILE MSDS SHEETS FOR THE CHEMICAL CATEGORY AND FOUR CHEMICALS SET FORTH IMMEDIATELY ABOVE FOR REPORTING YEAR 2000, AND POSSIBLY EARLIER YEARS. IN VIOLATION OF EPCRA SECTION 311.
Defendants (1)
- TEKSID ALUMINUM FOUNDRY, INC.Named in complaintNamed in settlement
Facilities (1)
NEMAK USA, INC.
1635 OLD COLUMBIA ROAD, DICKSON, TN, 37055
Registry ID: 110009786124
Statutes cited
- EPCRA 312 — Emergency and Hazardous Chemical Inventory Forms
- EPCRA 313 — Toxic Chemical Release Reporting (TRI)
- EPCRA 311 — Material Safety Data Sheets (MSDS)
Enforcement conclusions (1)
TEKSID ALUMINUM FOUNDRY, INC.entered 2003-05-28
Primary law: EPCRA
Timeline (3 milestones)
- 2003-05-28Enforcement Action Closed
- 2003-05-28Final Order Issued
- 2003-06-24Enforcement Action Data Entered
Case metadata
- EPA activity ID
- 97858
- Case number
- 04-2002-9982
- Lead agency
- EPA
- EPA region
- 04
- Voluntary self-disclosure
- Yes
- Primary statute
- Emergency and Hazardous Chemical Inventory Forms
Sourced verbatim from EPA ECHO Enforcement Case Report for case 04-2002-9982 . Bulk data: ICIS-FEC download summary.
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.