EPA v. Anaconda/Milgo (Referral f/Collection of Costs Due under AOC)
Final Order With Specified Cost Recovery
Case summary
'9/4/02 - Referral requests that a civil action be filed to recover EPA''s costs incurred in responding to the release and threatened release of hazardous stubstances at the site. The parties agreed to pay EPA''s oversight costs in three separate AOCs (Anaconda Removal AOC, Milgo Removal AOC, and the joint AOC for RI/FS. However, they have failed to pay costs billed to them in demand letters sent in 1997, 1999, and 2001.'
Defendants (6)
- Milgo Solutions, LLC
- Atlantic Richfield Company
- REPORT INVESTMENT CORPORATIONNamed in complaintNamed in settlement
- Dade Metals Corporation
- BLACK BOX NETWORK SERVICESNamed in complaintNamed in settlement
- NEXTIRAONE, LLC dba BLACK BOX NETWORK SERVICESNamed in complaintNamed in settlement
Facilities (1)
ANACONDA ALUM MIAMI ANODIZING
3630 NW 76TH ST, MIAMI, FL, 331470
Registry ID: 110008322840
Statutes cited
- CERCLA 122H — Administrative Cost Recovery Settlement
Enforcement conclusions (1)
Anaconda/Milgo (04-2008-C006)entered 2007-10-29
Primary law: CERCLA
Timeline (6 milestones)
- 2002-09-04Referred To Dept Of Justice
- 2002-10-25Enforcement Action Data Entered
- 2007-09-14Complaint Filed With Court
- 2007-09-14Final Order Lodged
- 2007-10-29Concluded
- 2007-10-29Final Order Entered
Case metadata
- EPA activity ID
- 87645
- Case number
- 04-2002-9088
- DOJ docket
- 90-11-2-07899/1
- Lead agency
- EPA
- EPA region
- 04
- Voluntary self-disclosure
- No
- Primary statute
- Administrative Cost Recovery Settlement
Sourced verbatim from EPA ECHO Enforcement Case Report for case 04-2002-9088 . Bulk data: ICIS-FEC download summary.
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.